Susie Jones
Notícias do sector • 3 min ler

O caminho para a sustentabilidade: O desafio europeu das emissões no sector dos transportes

Criado: 08/08/2024

Atualizado: 08/08/2024

Um relatório de 2024 da Clean Technica revelou que mais de 25% das emissões do tráfego rodoviário provêm do sector dos transportes na Europa - sendo os veículos pesados responsáveis por 85% das emissões (os autocarros e camionetas representam o restante).

Ao ritmo atual, o sector dos transportes representará, por si só, quase metade das emissões de gases com efeito de estufa da Europa em 2030 - as emissões dos transportes na Europa continuaram a aumentar em mais de um quarto desde 1990. As emissões em toda a economia diminuíram - contudo, desde o pico atingido em 2007, o sector dos transportes tem vindo a descarbonizar-se mais três vezes mais lentamenter do que o resto da economia.

Qual é a causa do aumento das emissões de CO2 no sector dos transportes?

Desde a proliferação do comércio eletrónico e dos serviços de entrega ao domicílio, a procura de mais camiões na estrada aumentou significativamente. Consequentemente, o aumento da procura resultou num aumento das emissões de CO2 no sector dos transportes.

Um relatório da [Clean Technica] (https://cleantechnica.com/2024/05/13/eu-wisely-stiffens-road-freight-passenger-emissions-guidance/) sobre a tonelagem do transporte doméstico de mercadorias em diferentes modos (rodoviário, ferroviário e marítimo) revelou que o transporte rodoviário de mercadorias é mais dominante na Europa do que o ferroviário e marítimo, em comparação com outras regiões (EUA e Índia). Embora a China esteja mais dependente do transporte rodoviário de mercadorias, o relatório revelou que o país operava com cerca de 600 000 camiões eléctricos para entregar mercadorias.

Que planos estão a ser implementados na Europa para reduzir as emissões de CO2?

O Parlamento Europeu adoptou a [Lei Europeia do Clima] (https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/european-climate-law_en#:~:text=The%20European%20Climate%20Law%20writes,2030%2C%20compared%20to%201990%20levels.) para fazer face ao aumento das emissões de CO2. Como parte desta lei, o objetivo da UE de reduzir as emissões líquidas de gases com efeito de estufa até 2030 foi aumentado para, pelo menos, 55% - tornando a neutralidade climática até 2050 juridicamente vinculativa.

Em maio de 2024, os países da UE aprovaram uma lei para reduzir as emissões de CO2 dos camiões. A nova lei exigirá que os novos veículos pesados vendidos na UE a partir de 2040 sejam isentos de emissões, impondo simultaneamente uma redução de 90% das emissões de CO2 dos novos veículos pesados de mercadorias até ao mesmo ano. Os fabricantes devem vender uma grande quantidade de veículos pesados totalmente isentos de CO2 - por exemplo, veículos eléctricos e a hidrogénio - para compensar as restantes vendas de veículos que emitem CO

Que acções podem os gestores de frotas tomar para reduzir as emissões de CO2?

Os gestores de frotas podem adotar medidas para reduzir as suas emissões de CO2:

  • A travagem brusca, a aceleração rápida e o ralenti podem aumentar o consumo de combustível e as emissões de gases com efeito de estufa - Embora a monitorização do comportamento do condutor possa ser um desafio, a tecnologia de IA pode fornecer feedback contínuo aos condutores e gestores de frotas. Saiba mais sobre como a IA pode ter um impacto positivo na sustentabilidade no sector dos transportes.

  • As frotas com veículos mais antigos podem mudar para veículos pesados de mercadorias movidos a óleo vegetal tratado com hidrogénio (HVO), hidrogénio ou eletricidade para reduzir significativamente as emissões. No entanto, os gestores de frotas devem ter em conta a distância que os veículos alimentados por combustíveis alternativos podem percorrer e as implicações em termos de custos.

  • A [Conta SNAP] (https://snapacc.com/) permite aos gestores de frotas reduzir a quilometragem dos desvios - com mais de 600 parceiros de serviços disponíveis para os clientes da Conta SNAP, os gestores de frotas podem planear paragens nocturnas para os seus condutores durante o percurso.

Existem infra-estruturas para carregar veículos pesados de mercadorias eléctricos?

De acordo com um [estudo da PwC] (https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/de/en/industries/transport/the-dawn-of-electrified-trucking.html), até 2030, um terço de todos os camiões na Europa serão eléctricos. Uma vez que as empresas de frotas estão a tomar medidas no sentido da eletrificação, as paragens de camiões em toda a Europa têm de ser capazes de satisfazer a procura de estações de carregamento elétrico.

A disponibilização da infraestrutura terá um custo para muitas paragens de camiões e estações de serviço. No entanto, aqueles que já dispõem de carregadores para veículos eléctricos estão bem posicionados para tirar partido das futuras vagas de camiões eléctricos. Até 2030, as estações de carregamento públicas na Europa aumentarão para mais de 3.600 - A UE apresentou uma lei ambiciosa para o carregamento com o Regulamento de Infra-estruturas para Combustíveis Alternativos (AFIR). O AFIR planeia equipar a rede rodoviária principal com parques de carregamento a cada 60 km - fornecendo energia de carregamento e capacidade de hidrogénio suficientes para que 9% das frotas de camiões e autocarros tenham emissões zero até 2030.

Qual é o país europeu com mais emissões de CO2?

Em 2021, a Alemanha, a França e a Itália foram responsáveis pelas maiores emissões globais de gases com efeito de estufa (GEE) - variando entre [375 000 e 740 000 kton de CO2] (https://ccpi.org/which-european-countries-are-the-worst-climate-polluters-and-why/). No entanto, os países com maiores populações produzem mais emissões de GEE - por conseguinte, a visualização das emissões globais de gases com efeito de estufa fornece uma imagem distorcida.

Uma visão imparcial das emissões oferece uma perspetiva diferente: o Luxemburgo, a Irlanda e a República Checa produziram as emissões per capita mais elevadas da UE em 2021.

Qual é a forma mais ecológica de transportar mercadorias?

O transporte de mercadorias por caminho de ferro é um dos modos de transporte mais limpos, mas também oferece outros benefícios:

  • Reduz o congestionamento rodoviário, o que contribui para melhorar a qualidade do ar.

  • O caminho de ferro oferece uma forma mais rápida de transportar mercadorias e elimina os obstáculos ao tráfego pesado.

Os camiões de combustível alternativo são outra forma amiga do ambiente de transportar mercadorias. O óleo vegetal tratado com hidrogénio (HVO) pode reduzir imediatamente até 90% das emissões de gases com efeito de estufa em comparação com o gasóleo normal ao longo do ciclo de vida do produto. A Certas Energy HVO está por detrás da mudança para uma alternativa mais limpa - ajudando as empresas a atingir os seus objectivos de sustentabilidade e a dar passos significativos em direção ao seu futuro líquido zero.

Partilhar para

Outros também lêem...

Header Image

segunda-feira 28 julho 2025 • Notícias do sector

COMBUSTÍVEL VS CARGA: A MUDANÇA PARA A ELECTRICIDADE É MAIS BARATA OU APENAS MAIS ECOLÓGICA?

Guest

The growth of electric charging stations across Europe for HGVs has led to a transitional period across the continent's vast road networks. For many fleet operators and drivers, classic diesel-fuelled HGVs are still the transport of choice. However, the shift to electric HGVs is looming, as the industry continues to evolve.To assess the feasibility of switching from diesel to electric, SNAP has authored research into the costs of recharging HGVs vs refuelling them across various European freight routes. We calculated the electricity versus diesel savings in euros per 100 km across .We found that Iceland led the way with an average cost saving of , with fellow Nordic countries Norway and Finland offering the second and third highest cost savings respectively. At the other end of the scale, Croatia offered the least amount of cost savings with , followed by Cyprus and Moldova.In this article, we uncover the cost savings per European country and analyses some of the cost savings per European country and analyses some of the external factors that may be influencing these savings. We also dive into what the future of eHGVs in Europe may look like as well as how eHGVs can help fleet operators and drivers save money, particularly with .Our research found that for every European country investigated, using an eHGV with electric charging saved money when compared to using a traditional HGV with fuel. The primary difference was just how much the cost savings varied. For example, the price for electricity in the most expensive country, (41 euros higher) than the least expensive country, Croatia.We found that on average, a driver with an electric HGV will save when compared with a diesel HGV driver. This translates to an estimated a year for long-haul electric HGV drivers and .To compile our data, we looked at 35 European countries and compared the energy or fuel cost per 100 km for two types of heavy goods vehicles (HGVs). These were a standard diesel HGV, assuming fuel consumption of 35 litres per 100 km at each country's average retail diesel price, and an electric HGV, assuming electricity use of 108 kWh per 100 km based on the average non-household electricity rate. VAT and recoverable taxes were excluded from these calculations. The comparison reflects direct “at-the-pump” or “at-the-plug” costs only, without accounting for factors such as fleet size, negotiated energy contracts, or future changes in fuel and electricity prices.When researching the pricing for diesel and electricity, a number of sources were drawn from, including , and . It is worth noting that some of these sources refer to ‘Great Britain’ while others refer to the ‘UK’. For the purposes of this research, both terms were treated interchangeably., , and are currently the countries where the most can be saved by converting to an electric HGV.This is largely due to these countries ranking among the most expensive in Europe for diesel. Iceland ranks as the most expensive country in Europe for diesel (€2.07 per litre). This steep cost largely comes from its geographical isolation compared with the rest of Europe, leaving the cost of importing diesel much higher than that of other European nations. Iceland, like Norway and Finland, is also known for its high tax rate, which also contributes to its high fuel cost. and also make up the top two countries in the world for electric cars on the road as a share of passenger cars on the road. As a result, both countries have invested significantly in electric charging infrastructure.Iceland’s small size and main ring road also make it easier to install electric charging stations at regular intervals for electric HGV drivers. The same reasoning can be partly used for other countries with smaller networks that have a high rate of cost savings, including Albania, Serbia, and Belgium — although it should be noted that all three also have some of the most expensive diesel prices in Europe, which contributes to the difference in cost savings.The chart below shows the top 10 countries that have the largest cost savings when using an electric HGV:Matthew Bellamy Croatia , Cyprus , and Moldova are currently the three countries with the lowest cost savings in Europe.Croatia has the in the EU after Poland. This is partly because of Croatia's poor EV charging infrastructure, such as charging stations that require ringing customer service or use multiple different apps to start the charging process, poor directions for charging stations outside major highways, and potentially high wait times during peak tourist season. Additionally, Croatia lacks ultra-high-speed charging stations (180 kW and above), which can prove a problem for electric HGVs that require more power than the average EV.Both Cyprus and Moldova have internal geopolitical issues that make infrastructure planning for EV charging (as well as national planning in general) difficult. For Cyprus, the northern half of the island — including half of its capital, Nicosia — has been -backed Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus since 1974. For Moldova, the eastern province of Transnistria acts as a de facto state with its own government. This means that both countries are unable to implement EV infrastructure in a consistent way across the territory they consider their own.The issues in Cyprus are also compounded by high electricity costs, while Moldova has the fifth cheapest diesel prices in Europe. Moldova is also the , making investment in EV infrastructure a challenge. All these factors contribute to an overall low cost saving for electric HGVs.Poland is also low on the list with a cost saving of . Despite its impressive economic growth and growing investment in EV charging infrastructure, its large size means that coverage is still an issue in certain areas of the country — although this looks likely to .Countries such as Spain , Romania , and Ireland occupy the middle of the road when it comes to cost saving for electric HGVs. This is likely due to these countries have growing EV charging infrastructure, and mid-priced electricity and diesel costs.The chart below shows the top 10 countries that have the lowest cost savings when using an electric HGV:The , which places it 11th overall for cost savings from recharging per 100 km. This is largely due to how expensive UK fuel prices are, with . Although the savings from high diesel costs certainly contribute to the UK’s high eHGV costs savings, it would likely be far higher if the electricity in the UK were not also amongst the in Europe.The UK is also expecting improvements to its EV charging infrastructure. The UK motorway service company, Moto is actively planning to build . These superhubs can better accommodate EV charging for eHGVs more efficiently than a standard EV charger. There are currently . With like BP Pulse and Aegis Energy also looking to invest, it looks likely that the UK will have a much-improved HGV charging network in the near future.There are several factors currently impacting HGV electrification, including a lack of charging infrastructure, long charge times, the high initial costs of eHGV conversion, and their limited range. Additionally, the comparatively low cost and accessibility of diesel fuel and vehicles make traditional HGVs an attractive option for However, all these impacts can vary depending on the country of operation. For example, if your fleet only runs domestically in a country such as Norway or Iceland, then it is likely to be less affected than a fleet operating across Europe or in regions with poorer eHGV infrastructure, such as the Balkans.The main obstacle to HGV electrification is insufficient eHGV charging infrastructure. This is because eHGVs require megawatt-scale charging, which most existing EV charging points for passenger vehicles (standard electric cars and vans) do not support.There are many countries in Europe that severely lack such infrastructure, especially on major freight routes and at truck stops. These tend to be poorer states in southern and eastern Europe such as Moldova, Georgia, and Bulgaria. It is no coincidence that these states rank in the bottom 10 for eHGV cost savings.It can also be the case that eHGV charging stations do exist, but they are in areas that simply can’t accommodate multiple eHGVs charging overnight due to a weak local power grid. This is often a problem in more rural and remote parts of Europe.Although many European countries are planning to improve eHGV infrastructure, it is still a time-consuming and expensive process, with numerous bureaucratic, logistical, and technical obstacles to overcome — not to mention the surrounding infrastructure upgrades, such as local grid connections, that will also be needed.Electric HGVs take far longer to charge than standard EVs. This means that charging must often take place overnight. Even if rapid eHGV chargers can be acquired, the process still takes at , rather than a few minutes, as is the case with petrol vehicles.This long charging time can have a knock-on effect for fleet operators in terms of turnaround times. In an industry with tight delivery schedules and deadlines, this can be potentially detrimental to business performance.Electric HGVs are also constricted by their relatively limited range compared to the mileage afforded by traditional HGVs. According to Safety Shield, a typical electric HGV has a range of around on a single charge (roughly the distance from London to Rotterdam). A typical diesel-powered HGV, however, can travel up to on a single tank of fuel (roughly the distance from London to Warsaw).Electric HGV mileage can also be more affected by external factors such as load, , and terrain. This can lead to range anxiety for drivers, who may conduct more frequent charges to ensure they have enough power to reach their destination. This, in turn, can lead to delivery delays, especially when driving through countries with poor eHGV charging infrastructure.All of this makes it vital for fleet operators planning journeys for their eHGVs. It should be noted that battery technology is constantly evolving, and capacity — and therefore mileage — will continue to improve in the near future.The initial cost of an eHGV is high (typically between , compared to between £80,000-£100,000 for a diesel HGV) which can potentially deter independent drivers and smaller fleet operators from owing one. This is largely due to the expense of the battery technology involved. This means that it will be costly to purchase a new electric HGV outright as the technology inside is more expensive than that of a diesel HGV.High initial eHGV purchasing costs also means that fleet operators in countries with cheaper electricity rates for eHGV charging such as Norway, Sweden, or Finland are more likely to convert since they will recoup their investment quicker than those in countries with expensive electricity, such as Ireland and Croatia.Electricity prices can also fluctuate in relation to various events. For example, over the past five years, electricity prices have fluctuated in response to economies opening up after the COVID-19 pandemic and then Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 (the latter in particular had major effects on European energy supply). As a result, there was a spike in electricity prices of almost 30%, from for the average EU capital in the post-invasion period. With the EU average now, however, , it appears that electric charging for HGVs is set to continue its ascendency.Across Europe, the average cost of running an electric HGV over 100 km is €20.51 — significantly cheaper than the €51.10 it costs for a diesel HGV over the same distance.As efficiency improves and battery technology becomes more widespread and less expensive to produce, eHGVs will also become more affordable to acquire.Diesel fuel still plays a dominant role in the HGV industry. This is because diesel infrastructure has been well established in Europe for decades, especially in comparison to electric chargers for HGVs. Diesel's compatibility with , and its relatively cheapness also keep it popular with truck fleet managers.As with electricity, however, the value of diesel fluctuates across the continent. This is why it can appear more advantageous to stick with diesel HGVs in countries like Moldova, Georgia, and Malta, where diesel remains cheap. Conversely, for nations like Iceland and the Netherlands, where diesel is relatively expensive, there is greater incentive to switch to an electric HGV.A country with low-cost fuel may also be more hesitant to invest heavily in eHGV infrastructure for fear of alienating traditional HGV fleets, who may choose alternative routes as a result.Electric HGVs are the long-term future of road haulage. Not only are they cheaper to run over time, but with new infrastructure being invested in and built at a strong rate, they will also become much more financially and strategically viable.Beyond the economic benefits, electric HGVs are also important for their contribution to environmental goals such as Net Zero. With traditional HGVs being large-scale polluters, the by eHGVs will be felt in cleaner air across Europe.The look set to impact electric HGVs in the future:: will evolve to better accommodate eHGVs alongside other smart technological advancements. These truck parks may include up-to-date ultra-fast charging stations, diagnostic machines, battery swap stations, and automated cleaning services, among other features. : Low Emission Zones (LEZs) already exist in a number of cities (e.g. Paris, Berlin, and Milan) with more European cities likely to follow suit with more stringent. Fleet operators may opt for eHGVs to meet EU regulations or retrofit their HGVs with cleaner technologies, like . : has already had a across road haulage — with applications in route optimisation, predictive maintenance, and . Electric vehicles will likely incorporate AI to help drive sustainability in the haulage industry over the coming decades. : The shift to eHGVs is part of a wider global push toward sustainable living. The effects of extreme weather, including heatwaves and floods across Europe, show no sign of slowing due to climate change. Moving to electric HGVs is one way the world is reducing its dependence on fossil fuels. : During the transition to cleaner fuel sources, there will be a variety of HGV types on the road throughout the 2030s. Many will be older diesel models, some will be electric, and others will be powered by alternative fuels such as biofuel made from renewable biomass sources.Electric HGVs are the future, of that there is little doubt. The economic and environmental benefits will see more fleet operators and drivers switch to eHGVs in the coming years. How long this transitional period lasts will depend on how quickly Europe can develop its eHGV charging infrastructure.There are currently large swathes of the continent where eHGVs lack viability and require extensive route optimisation due to their shorter range. Additionally, the upfront costs involved can deter independent drivers and smaller fleet operators.The technology and infrastructure will continue to improve, and there are already services, like those found on the SNAP portal, designed to make managing eHGV fleets and related costs as simple as possible. From route optimisation and fleet management to maps for parking and truck washes, SNAP makes trucking simple.

Header Image

segunda-feira 07 julho 2025 • Notícias do sector

O QUE SIGNIFICA A EXPANSÃO DO CAMINHO-DE-FERRO DE INVERNESS PARA O SECTOR DA MOBILIDADE?

Susie Jones

In June, plans to ease HGV traffic in favour of rail freight at the 'cloud factory' (West Fraser wood panel manufacturing) near Inverness were given the green light. The expansion will remove from the A96 each year. We examine the impact this will have on the haulage industry. The plans will come in two phases, both of which will expand rail freight services to create a sustainable operational future. to be completed by next year and will see 20,000 HGVs removed from the roads yearly. aims to remove 40,000 HGVs, the equivalent of 60% of their current HGV traffic each year. This phase will be completed by 2028. Further expansion of phase two will allow other companies around Inverness to use their rail facilities for freight.Due to the rail freight expansion, the industry will no doubt see a reduction in road haulage to that area. The changes equate to roughly , alleviating the pressure on the A96.Although haulage firms will see a decline in demand for long-distance timber trucking, they will see a rise in shorter, last-mile HGV movements such as, collecting timber to transport to the railyard. The sector may also see growth in rail logistics roles, such as coordinating loading between trucks and trains. In 2022, were transported by HGVs within the UK, involving approximately 156 million HGV journeys. The mobility sector has long been one of the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union. In 2022, it emitted of Europe's transport GHG emissions. Despite this high figure, the industry has shown slow progress in reducing its emissions. The shift to rail at the 'Cloud Factory' is expected to cut around . A small albeit important step in the right direction in aiding the sector's transition to net zero by 2050. Although many may see this change as a negative, the haulage industry could still benefit. Goods will still need to be transported from the road to the rail network this poses a new opportunity for hauliers to offer this specialist service. In the area, transport companies could handle inbound timber deliveries and intermodal freight.West Fraser themselves have estimated that the change will likely see an increase in HGVs to and from the site.As the industry moves toward more rail integration, haulage firms must adapt quickly and invest more. • Fleets will transition from long-haul logging trucks to specialised short-haul journeys. • Investment in specialised equipment may be essential for loading containers. • Partnerships with rail operators and railyard managers could have a positive impact on haulage companies. SNAP provides parking across the UK and Europe. Use the or download to find your space today.

Header Image

terça-feira 25 março 2025 • Notícias do sector

O CRESCIMENTO DOS CONDUTORES: TUDO O QUE PRECISA DE SABER SOBRE AS MUDANÇAS NA APRENDIZAGEM

Susie Jones

Apprenticeships in the logistics sector have long provided a pathway for young people and career changers to gain experience in the industry while still earning a wage. However, for a long time, the industry has been calling for urgent reform after it had seen a decline in apprenticeships since the rollout of the Apprenticeship Levy and other challenging factors. A concerning trend is that, according to the RHA, the industry will require new truck drivers over the next five years to meet demand and support growth.In February 2025, the Government announced it would enforce changes to the apprenticeship scheme, allowing up to more apprentices to qualify yearly. We look at the key changes and what it means for the industry.• Businesses will be able to decide whether adult learners over 19 will need to complete level 2 English and maths qualification (equivalent to GCSE) to pass their apprenticeship (Effective immediately).• The duration of an apprenticeship has been reduced from 12 months to eight months (Effective from August 2025).• With a shorter apprenticeship duration, fleet companies can quickly train new drivers and logistics staff improving workforce availability. • Companies now have more say in determining whether English and Maths qualifications are necessary A change benefitting the haulage industry, where practical skills are more relevant. • By changing the educational requirements, a barrier has been removed for many potential apprentices looking to get into the industry. • Skills England, a new government body, will give businesses a stronger voice in shaping apprenticeship standards and funding. Fleet operators will benefit from more tailored training programs that meet industry needs. • A shorter apprenticeship duration combined with more employer flexibility will result in a more attractive process for everyone involved.There are several steps employers must take to employ an apprentice, and the steps vary depending on the country. This guidance is for employers in England guidance for other UK countries can be found • for your business.• for this apprenticeship.• Check to see what • to manage funding and recruit apprentices.• • Make an with your chosen apprentice.Employing apprentices provides fleet companies with a cost-effective way to train skilled workers. Government funding for apprenticeship schemes can reduce training costs, making it a viable long-term investment for fleet operators. Companies can benefit from new employees who bring fresh energy into the workplace and who are keen to learn. Apprenticeships in the haulage industry offer the opportunity to earn while gaining valuable skills in logistics, vehicle operations, and safety regulations. Currently, the industry is in demand for skilled drivers, and apprentices will benefit from good opportunities for career advancement.