Guest
Nyheder om industrien • 9 min læsning

Brændstof vs. opladning: Er skiftet til el billigere eller bare grønnere?

Oprettet: 28.07.2025

Opdateret: 19.09.2025

Væksten i antallet af elektriske ladestationer til lastbiler i Europa har ført til en overgangsperiode på kontinentets store vejnet. For mange flådeoperatører og chauffører er de klassiske dieseldrevne lastbiler stadig det foretrukne transportmiddel. Men skiftet til elektriske lastbiler er nært forestående, efterhånden som branchen fortsætter med at udvikle sig.

For at vurdere, om det er muligt for [flådeoperatører] (https://snapacc.com/fleet-operators/) at skifte fra diesel til el, har SNAP lavet en undersøgelse af omkostningerne ved at oplade lastbiler i forhold til at tanke dem op på forskellige europæiske fragtruter. Vi beregnede besparelserne på el i forhold til diesel i euro pr. 100 km på tværs af 35 europæiske lande.

Vi fandt, at Island førte an med en gennemsnitlig omkostningsbesparelse på 61,03 euro pr. 100 km, mens de nordiske lande Norge og Finland tilbød henholdsvis den næsthøjeste og den tredjehøjeste omkostningsbesparelse. I den anden ende af skalaen tilbød Kroatien den mindste omkostningsbesparelse med 19,96 € pr. 100 km, efterfulgt af Cypern og Moldova.

I denne artikel afdækker vi omkostningsbesparelserne pr. europæisk land og analyserer nogle af omkostningsbesparelserne pr. europæisk land og analyserer nogle af de eksterne faktorer, der kan have indflydelse på disse besparelser. Vi dykker også ned i, hvordan fremtiden for eHGV'er i Europa kan se ud, samt hvordan eHGV'er kan hjælpe flådeoperatører og chauffører med at spare penge, især med [chaufførbudgetter] (https://snapacc.com/newsroom/a-truck-drivers-guide-to-budgeting/).

Hvordan eHGV og dieselomkostninger står sig i hele EU

Vores undersøgelse viste, at der i alle de undersøgte europæiske lande var penge at spare ved at bruge en eHGV med elektrisk opladning sammenlignet med en traditionel lastbil med brændstof. Den primære forskel var, hvor meget omkostningsbesparelserne varierede. For eksempel er prisen på elektricitet i det dyreste land, Island, 206 % højere (41 euro højere) end i det billigste land, Kroatien.

Vi fandt ud af, at en chauffør med en elektrisk lastbil i gennemsnit vil spare 30,59 euro pr. 100 km sammenlignet med en chauffør med en diesel-lastbil. Det svarer til en anslået gennemsnitlig besparelse på €37.200 om året for chauffører af elektriske lastbiler på lange strækninger og €24.800 for chauffører på indenlandske strækninger.

For at indsamle vores data kiggede vi på 35 europæiske lande og sammenlignede energi- eller brændstofomkostningerne pr. 100 km for to typer tunge lastbiler (HGV'er). Det var en standard diesel-lastbil, hvor vi antog et brændstofforbrug på 35 liter pr. 100 km til hvert lands gennemsnitlige detailpris på diesel, og en elektrisk lastbil, hvor vi antog et elforbrug på 108 kWh pr. 100 km baseret på den gennemsnitlige elpris for ikke-husholdninger. Moms og afgifter, der kan refunderes, er ikke medtaget i disse beregninger. Sammenligningen afspejler kun direkte omkostninger "ved pumpen" eller "ved stikket" uden at tage højde for faktorer som flådestørrelse, forhandlede energikontrakter eller fremtidige ændringer i brændstof- og elpriser.

Da vi undersøgte priserne på diesel og elektricitet, brugte vi en række kilder, bl.a. Eurostat, CEIC, GlobalPetrolPrices, Webfleet og Gov.uk. Det er værd at bemærke, at nogle af disse kilder henviser til "Storbritannien", mens andre henviser til "UK". I forbindelse med denne undersøgelse blev begge udtryk behandlet i flæng.

Lande, der sparer mest ved at skifte til elektriske lastbiler

Island (61,03 euro), Norge (49,31 euro)* og Finland (49,12 euro)* er i øjeblikket de lande, hvor der kan spares mest ved at skifte til en elektrisk lastbil.

Det skyldes i høj grad, at disse lande er blandt de dyreste i Europa, når det gælder diesel. Island er det dyreste land i Europa, når det gælder diesel (2,07 euro pr. liter). Denne høje pris skyldes i høj grad landets geografiske isolation i forhold til resten af Europa, hvilket betyder, at omkostningerne ved at importere diesel er meget højere end i andre europæiske lande. Ligesom Norge og Finland er Island også kendt for sin høje skatteprocent, som også bidrager til de høje brændstofomkostninger.

Norge (32 %) og Island (18 %)** er også de to lande i verden, der har flest elbiler på vejene i forhold til antallet af personbiler på vejene. Som følge heraf har begge lande investeret betydeligt i elektrisk opladningsinfrastruktur.

Islands lille størrelse og hovedringvej gør det også lettere at installere elektriske ladestationer med jævne mellemrum til chauffører af elektriske lastbiler. Det samme ræsonnement kan til dels bruges for andre lande med mindre netværk, der har en høj grad af omkostningsbesparelser, herunder Albanien, Serbien og Belgien - selvom det skal bemærkes, at alle tre også har nogle af de dyreste dieselpriser i Europa, hvilket bidrager til forskellen i omkostningsbesparelser.

Diagrammet nedenfor viser de 10 lande, der har de største omkostningsbesparelser ved brug af en elektrisk lastbil:

"Chauffører i hele Europa sparer allerede ved at skifte til elektriske lastbiler. At skifte til opladning af eHGV'er er branchens fremtid, og SNAP er klar til at hjælpe chauffører og flådeoperatører med overgangen."

Matthew Bellamy - administrerende direktør hos SNAP.

Lande, der sparer mindst ved at skifte til elektriske lastbiler

Kroatien (19,96 €), Cypern (21,16 €) og Moldova (22,72 €) er i øjeblikket de tre lande med de laveste omkostningsbesparelser i Europa.

Kroatien har den [næstlangsommeste udbredelse af elbiler] (https://www.smf.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Decreasing-transport-poverty-in-Europe-through-public-EV-chargepoints-March2025.pdf) i EU efter Polen. Det skyldes til dels Kroatiens dårlige infrastruktur til opladning af elbiler, f.eks. ladestationer, der kræver, at man ringer til kundeservice eller bruger flere forskellige apps til at starte opladningsprocessen, dårlige anvisninger til ladestationer uden for større motorveje og potentielt lange ventetider i højsæsonen for turister. Derudover mangler Kroatien ultrahurtige ladestationer (180 kW og derover), hvilket kan vise sig at være et problem for elektriske lastbiler, der kræver mere strøm end den gennemsnitlige elbil.

Både Cypern og Moldova har interne geopolitiske problemer, som gør det vanskeligt at planlægge infrastruktur til opladning af elbiler (og national planlægning generelt). For Cyperns vedkommende har den nordlige halvdel af øen - inklusive halvdelen af hovedstaden Nicosia - været besat af den tyrkisk-støttede Tyrkiske Republik Nordcypern siden 1974. For Moldova fungerer den østlige provins Transnistrien som en de facto-stat med sin egen regering. Det betyder, at begge lande ikke er i stand til at implementere EV-infrastruktur på en konsekvent måde på tværs af det område, de betragter som deres eget.

Problemerne i Cypern forstærkes også af høje elpriser, mens Moldova har de femtebilligste dieselpriser i Europa. Moldova er også det [næstfattigste land i Europa] (https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/poorest-countries-in-europe), hvilket gør investeringer i infrastruktur til elbiler til en udfordring. Alle disse faktorer bidrager til en samlet lav omkostningsbesparelse for elektriske lastbiler.

Polen ligger også lavt på listen med en omkostningsbesparelse på 24,22 €. På trods af den imponerende økonomiske vækst og voksende investeringer i infrastruktur til opladning af elbiler betyder landets store størrelse, at dækningen stadig er et problem i visse områder af landet - selvom dette sandsynligvis vil [ændre sig i fremtiden] (https://alternative-fuels-observatory.ec.europa.eu/general-information/news/poland-launches-major-funding-programs-zero-emission-transport).

Lande som Spanien (€32,20), Rumænien (€30,62) og Irland (€30,54) ligger midt i feltet, når det gælder omkostningsbesparelser for elektriske lastbiler. Det skyldes sandsynligvis, at disse lande har en voksende infrastruktur til opladning af elbiler og middelmådige el- og dieselpriser.

Diagrammet nedenfor viser de 10 lande, der har de laveste omkostningsbesparelser ved brug af en elektrisk lastbil:

Storbritanniens omkostningsbesparelser for elektriske lastbiler

Storbritannien har en besparelse på 36,23 euro, hvilket placerer landet på en 11. plads over besparelser på opladning pr. 100 km. Det skyldes i høj grad de dyre brændstofpriser i Storbritannien, hvor **dieselpriserne er de tredjedyreste i Europa. Selvom besparelserne fra de høje dieselpriser helt sikkert bidrager til Storbritanniens høje eHGV-omkostningsbesparelser, ville de sandsynligvis være langt højere, hvis elektriciteten i Storbritannien ikke også var blandt de [dyreste] (https://reports.electricinsights.co.uk/q4-2024/why-are-britains-power-prices-the-highest-in-the-world/) i Europa.

Storbritannien forventer også forbedringer af sin infrastruktur til opladning af elbiler. Den britiske motorvejsservicevirksomhed Moto planlægger aktivt at bygge [15 'superhubs' inden 2027] (https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/electric-hgv-charging-superhubs-planned-for-motorway-services). Disse superhubs kan oplade elbiler mere effektivt end en standardoplader til elbiler. Der er i øjeblikket færre end fem eHGV-dedikerede opladningspunkter på de britiske veje. Med [andre virksomheder] (https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/electric-hgv-charging-superhubs-planned-for-motorway-services) som BP Pulse og Aegis Energy, der også ønsker at investere, ser det ud til, at Storbritannien vil få et meget bedre netværk til opladning af lastbiler i den nærmeste fremtid.

Hvad påvirker elektrificeringen af lastbiler?

Der er flere faktorer, der i øjeblikket påvirker elektrificeringen af lastbiler, herunder mangel på opladningsinfrastruktur, lange opladningstider, de høje startomkostninger ved konvertering af eHGV'er og deres begrænsede rækkevidde. Derudover gør de relativt lave omkostninger og tilgængeligheden af dieselbrændstof og køretøjer traditionelle lastbiler til en attraktiv mulighed for [flådeoperatører] (https://snapacc.com/fleet-operators/).

Alle disse konsekvenser kan dog variere afhængigt af driftslandet. Hvis din flåde f.eks. kun kører indenrigs i et land som Norge eller Island, vil den sandsynligvis blive mindre påvirket end en flåde, der kører i hele Europa eller i regioner med dårligere eHGV-infrastruktur, f.eks. på Balkan.

Utilstrækkelig opladningsinfrastruktur

Den største hindring for elektrificering af lastbiler er utilstrækkelig infrastruktur til opladning af eHGV'er. Det skyldes, at eHGV'er kræver opladning i megawatt-skala, hvilket de fleste eksisterende ladestandere til personbiler (almindelige elbiler og varevogne) ikke understøtter.

Der er mange lande i Europa, som i høj grad mangler en sådan infrastruktur, især på store fragtruter og ved lastbilstoppesteder. Det er ofte fattigere stater i Syd- og Østeuropa som Moldova, Georgien og Bulgarien. Det er ikke tilfældigt, at disse lande ligger i bund, når det gælder omkostningsbesparelser ved eHGV.

Det kan også være, at der findes ladestationer til eHGV'er, men at de befinder sig i områder, hvor der simpelthen ikke er plads til flere eHGV'er, der oplader natten over, på grund af et svagt lokalt elnet. Det er ofte et problem i mere landlige og afsidesliggende dele af Europa.

Selvom mange europæiske lande planlægger at forbedre eHGV-infrastrukturen, er det stadig en tidskrævende og dyr proces med mange bureaukratiske, logistiske og tekniske forhindringer, der skal overvindes - for ikke at nævne de omkringliggende infrastrukturopgraderinger, som f.eks. lokale netforbindelser, der også vil være nødvendige.

Lange opladningstider

Elektriske lastbiler tager meget længere tid at oplade end almindelige elbiler. Det betyder, at opladningen ofte skal foregå natten over. Selv hvis der kan skaffes hurtige eHGV-opladere, tager processen stadig [mindst to timer] (https://dhl-freight-connections.com/en/solutions/charging-times-for-electric-trucks-the-goal-is-less-than-30-minutes/) i stedet for et par minutter, som det er tilfældet med benzindrevne køretøjer.

Denne lange opladningstid kan have en afsmittende effekt på flådeoperatørernes ekspeditionstid. I en branche med stramme leveringsplaner og deadlines kan det potentielt være skadeligt for virksomhedens resultater.

Begrænset rækkevidde for eHGV'er

Elektriske lastbiler begrænses også af deres relativt begrænsede rækkevidde sammenlignet med de kilometer, som traditionelle lastbiler kan køre. Ifølge Safety Shield har en typisk elektrisk lastbil en rækkevidde på omkring 300 miles på en enkelt opladning (omtrent afstanden fra London til Rotterdam). En typisk dieseldrevet lastbil kan derimod køre op til 1.000 miles på en enkelt tankfuld brændstof (omtrent afstanden fra London til Warszawa).

El-lastbilers kilometertal kan også blive mere påvirket af eksterne faktorer som f.eks. last, [koldt vejr] (https://snapacc.com/newsroom/a-truck-drivers-guide-to-winter-in-europe/) og terræn. Det kan føre til rækkeviddeangst hos chaufførerne, som måske oplader oftere for at sikre, at de har strøm nok til at nå deres destination. Det kan igen føre til leveringsforsinkelser, især når man kører gennem lande med dårlig infrastruktur til opladning af eHGV'er.

Alt dette gør det [ruteoptimering] (https://snapacc.com/newsroom/route-optimisation-with-fleet-management-software-snap-account/) afgørende for flådeoperatører, der planlægger rejser for deres eHGV'er. Det skal bemærkes, at batteriteknologien er i konstant udvikling, og at kapaciteten - og dermed kilometertallet - fortsat vil blive forbedret i den nærmeste fremtid.

Høje omkostninger for eHGV'er

Startomkostningerne for en eHGV er høje (typisk mellem [£160.000-£200.000] (https://electriccarguide.co.uk/the-electric-hgv-guide/), sammenlignet med mellem £80.000-£100.000 for en diesel-LGV), hvilket potentielt kan afholde uafhængige chauffører og mindre flådeoperatører fra at eje en. Dette skyldes i høj grad udgifterne til den involverede batteriteknologi. Det betyder, at det vil være dyrt at købe en ny elektrisk lastbil direkte, da teknologien i den er dyrere end i en diesel-lastbil.

De høje startomkostninger ved køb af eHGV'er betyder også, at flådeoperatører i lande med billigere elpriser for opladning af eHGV'er som Norge, Sverige eller Finland er mere tilbøjelige til at konvertere, da de vil tjene deres investering ind hurtigere end dem i lande med dyr elektricitet som Irland og Kroatien.

Elpriserne kan også svinge i forhold til forskellige begivenheder. I løbet af de sidste fem år har elpriserne f.eks. svinget som reaktion på, at økonomierne åbnede sig efter COVID-19-pandemien og derefter Ruslands invasion af Ukraine i 2022 (især sidstnævnte havde store konsekvenser for den europæiske energiforsyning). Som følge heraf var der en stigning i elpriserne på næsten 30 % fra [20,5 c€/kWh til 26,5 c€/kWh] (https://www.euronews.com/business/2025/02/24/three-years-on-how-russias-invasion-reshaped-energy-prices-across-europe) for den gennemsnitlige hovedstad i EU i perioden efter invasionen. Men da EU-gennemsnittet nu er lavere end det var i 2022, ser det ud til, at elektrisk opladning af lastbiler vil fortsætte sin fremmarch.

I hele Europa er de gennemsnitlige omkostninger ved at køre en elektrisk lastbil over 100 km 20,51 euro - betydeligt billigere end de 51,10 euro, det koster for en diesel-lastbil over den samme afstand.

I takt med at effektiviteten forbedres, og batteriteknologien bliver mere udbredt og billigere at producere, vil eHGV'er også blive billigere at anskaffe.

Billighed og tilgængelighed af dieselbrændstof

Dieselbrændstof spiller stadig en dominerende rolle i lastbilindustrien. Det skyldes, at dieselinfrastrukturen har været veletableret i Europa i årtier, især i sammenligning med elektriske opladere til lastbiler. Dieselens kompatibilitet med [brændstofkort] (https://snapacc.com/newsroom/fuel-cards-in-transportation-how-snap-simplifies-fleet-life/) og dens relativt lave pris gør den også populær blandt flådeadministratorer.

Ligesom med elektricitet svinger værdien af diesel dog på tværs af kontinentet. Derfor kan det virke mere fordelagtigt at holde fast i diesel-lastbiler i lande som Moldova, Georgien og Malta, hvor diesel fortsat er billigt. Omvendt er der i lande som Island og Holland, hvor diesel er relativt dyrt, et større incitament til at skifte til en elektrisk lastbil.

Et land med billige brændstoffer kan også være mere tilbageholdende med at investere kraftigt i eHGV-infrastruktur af frygt for at støde de traditionelle lastbilflåder fra sig, som måske vælger alternative ruter som følge heraf.

Fremtiden for elektriske lastbiler i Europa

Elektriske lastbiler er den langsigtede fremtid for vejtransport. Ikke alene er de billigere i drift med tiden, men da der investeres i og bygges ny infrastruktur i et højt tempo, vil de også blive meget mere økonomisk og strategisk levedygtige.

Ud over de økonomiske fordele er elektriske lastbiler også vigtige på grund af deres bidrag til miljømål som Net Zero. Da traditionelle lastbiler er store forurenere, vil de [sparede emissioner] (https://snapacc.com/newsroom/the-road-to-sustainability-the-european-emissions-challenge-within-the-transport-sector/) fra eHGV'er kunne mærkes i form af renere luft i hele Europa.

De [følgende tendenser] (https://snapacc.com/newsroom/the-road-ahead-for-2025-truck-industry-trends-to-expect/) ser ud til at påvirke elektriske lastbiler i fremtiden:

  • Smart truck parks: Truck parks in the future will evolve to better accommodate eHGVs alongside other smart technological advancements. These truck parks may include up-to-date ultra-fast charging stations, diagnostic machines, battery swap stations, and automated cleaning services, among other features.
  • Increased EU regulations: Low Emission Zones (LEZs) already exist in a number of cities (e.g. Paris, Berlin, and Milan) with more European cities likely to follow suit with more stringent EU transport regulations. Fleet operators may opt for eHGVs to meet EU regulations or retrofit their HGVs with cleaner technologies, like smart tachographs.
  • AI implementation: AI technology has already had a profound sustainability impact across road haulage — with applications in route optimisation, predictive maintenance, and autonomous vehicle development. Electric vehicles will likely incorporate AI to help drive sustainability in the haulage industry over the coming decades.
  • Sustainability: The shift to eHGVs is part of a wider global push toward sustainable living. The effects of extreme weather, including heatwaves and floods across Europe, show no sign of slowing due to climate change. Moving to electric HGVs is one way the world is reducing its dependence on fossil fuels.
  • Fuel variety: During the transition to cleaner fuel sources, there will be a variety of HGV types on the road throughout the 2030s. Many will be older diesel models, some will be electric, and others will be powered by alternative fuels such as biofuel made from renewable biomass sources.

Få styr på omkostningerne til eHGV på en smartere måde

Elektriske lastbiler er fremtiden, det er der ingen tvivl om. De økonomiske og miljømæssige fordele vil få flere flådeoperatører og chauffører til at skifte til eHGV'er i de kommende år. Hvor længe denne overgangsperiode varer, vil afhænge af, hvor hurtigt Europa kan udvikle sin infrastruktur til opladning af eHGV'er.

Der er i øjeblikket store dele af kontinentet, hvor eHGV'er ikke er levedygtige og kræver omfattende ruteoptimering på grund af deres kortere rækkevidde. Desuden kan startomkostningerne afskrække uafhængige chauffører og mindre flådeoperatører.

Teknologien og infrastrukturen vil fortsat blive forbedret, og der findes allerede tjenester, som er designet til at gøre administrationen af eHGV-flåder og de dermed forbundne omkostninger så enkel som muligt. Fra ruteoptimering og flådestyring til kort over parkering og vask af lastbiler - SNAP gør det nemt at køre lastbil.

[Tilmeld dig SNAP i dag.] (https://snapacc.com/sign-up/)

Del til

Andre læser også...

Header Image

torsdag 30 april 2026 • Nyheder om industrien

NÆSTE GENERATIONS REKRUTTERING: TILTRÆKNING AF YNGRE TALENTER TIL LASTBILBRANCHEN

Evelyn Long

The UK driver shortage is a familiar headline, but the real story is more complex than the numbers. It’s a fundamental shift in the workforce that requires a new mindset. While it’s a crisis, it’s also an opportunity for forward-thinking fleets to innovate and gain an edge over the competition. The companies that successfully attract the next generation of drivers will thrive in the coming decades. Here is a quick look at the forces fueling the disparity between retiring heavy goods vehicle (HGV) drivers and new apprentices. National unemployment figures are rising. In 2025, it climbed to leading up to December, the highest rate in nearly five years. At the same time, there is a severe shortage of professional drivers.The UK’s driver shortage is not a simple labor deficit. It is a skills shortage. Many barriers prevent the general unemployed population from filling the role, such as: ● High cost and time commitment for obtaining an HGV license● The requirement for a certificate of professional competence● The unique lifestyle demands that do not align with a standard 9-to-5 jobThe paradox of high unemployment and significant driver shortage is why industry bodies are not passively waiting for the job market to fix the problem. The government implemented , from enhancing the current supply chain’s efficiency to improving conditions to attract more drivers to the sector. The shortage is not solely due to a lack of new drivers. The industry is actively losing experienced professionals. While the proportion of businesses reporting vacancies has , the issue lies in the persistent hiring gap. Many are leaving for better pay or benefits elsewhere. Drivers may choose a warehouse job that offers a similar salary to their current one but provides predictable shifts and more social interactions. The physical and mental toll of long hours, social isolation and poor quality of roadside facilities are also push factors. Retirement is normal in any industry. The problem is that retiring drivers in the trucking sector are not being replaced at a comparable rate. This is a growing trend in many industrial industries, potentially pointing towards a larger societal shift towards these careers.The number of HGV drivers under the age of 35 between the third quarters of 2023 and 2024. Despite that, over 53% of the labor force across the industry is aged 50 years and older. Similarly, are 55 years or older. For industrial industries, this figure means a massive impending loss of experience, a shrinking pool of reliable talent and the risk of institutional knowledge walking out the door. The industry’s image is as significant a barrier as any practical challenge. The goal is to shift the narrative from the outdated “lonely trucker” stereotype to that of a “skilled logistics professional.” The first step to rebranding is to define what the job entails in the 21st century. Essentially, HGV professionals drive vehicles with a gross combined weight of , ensuring the safe and efficient delivery of products at the right time, location and condition. To attract young talent, fleet managers must acknowledge that most are seeking career paths and a sense of meaning. Recruiters can map out a visible career ladder to show that the role is not a “dead-end” job. For example, a path can look like a progression from lead driver to new apprentice mentor to transport planner to fleet manager. Connecting the job to a larger purpose is a sound strategy, as many of the younger generations want to make an impact. Link the driver's daily tasks to the bigger picture. Instead of stating how the job involves moving products, recruiters can highlight how the work ensures families have fresh food on their tables. Here are some changes fleet managers can adopt to become more effective employers.Ensure the apprenticeship program provides a modern, engaging and supportive experience. Pair apprentices with experienced drivers who are willing and trained to be mentors. Leverage technology in training. For example, programs can include high-fidelity driving simulators to allow apprentices to practice responding to hazardous conditions. The training must cover more than just passing the driving test. Include modules on customer service, financial literacy for potential owner-operators, in-cab technology and health and wellness courses for those on the road. Flexibility and predictability in scheduling are key attractors. Consider alternative models, such as: ● Hub-and-spoke: Drivers operate out of a local depot, handling the first and last leg of a journey and returning home daily. ● Relay systems: One driver takes a load from point A to a handover point B, where a second driver takes it to point C and so on. ● Fixed rotations: Implement schedules like “four days on, four days off” to provide solid, predictable blocks. Invest in the drivers’ comfort and safety to show them they are valued. There is a shortage of , which adds to the daily stress of drivers, wasted hours searching for safe parking and the risk of cargo theft. Fleet managers must ensure their depots are places professionals want to be, with clean, modern break rooms, showers and kitchens. Another impactful investment is to foster a culture of respect. Ensure dispatchers are supportive partners who help solve problems. Provide training for positive, respectful communication between drivers and the office to improve workforce satisfaction and retention.The shortage is a catalyst for necessary evolution. The fleets that will win the war for talent will be those that adapt their approach to modern drivers' expectations. Strategically rebranding the profession’s perception, modernizing practices and investing in real resources for driver welfare can set apart forward-thinking companies. The need for changes is challenging, but it’s also an exciting opportunity to build a stronger, more resilient workforce that will carry the UK haulage industry into the future. Discover more from

Header Image

tirsdag 28 april 2026 • Nyheder om industrien

HVORDAN SPÆNDINGER OMKRING IRAN KAN PÅVIRKE EUROPÆISK LOGISTIK

Lucy Mowatt

Geopolitical conflict rarely stays confined to the region where it began. In global logistics, disruption in one part of the world can quickly ripple through supply chains thousands of kilometres away.That is the reality as tensions escalate around Iran and the Strait of Hormuz – a narrow shipping channel between Iran and Oman that serves as one of the world’s most important transport corridors.Roughly passes through the strait, alongside large volumes of liquefied natural gas and other commodities. When shipping through this corridor slows or stops, the consequences are felt around the world.For transport operators in Europe, the effects are already beginning to emerge through rising fuel costs, rerouted shipping traffic and growing uncertainty in global supply chains. have already begun avoiding routes close to the Strait of Hormuz due to that transit is not allowed and that the area is unsafe. Vessels passing through or caught up in military action. Instead, they are diverting vessels via the at the southern tip of Africa. Although this avoids high-risk zones, it also adds thousands of miles to many journeys.For global supply chains, the effects are clear: Longer transit times Increased fuel consumption for vessels Higher freight costs for cargo ownersWhat begins as a maritime disruption often ends up affecting inland logistics once delayed cargo finally reaches European ports. This creates a “feast or famine” effect: periods with little cargo to move followed by sudden surges when multiple vessels arrive at once.Energy markets have been shaken by activity in the Strait of Hormuz.Because the waterway handles such a large share of global oil exports, any disruption immediately affects expectations about future supply. Even short-term interruptions can cause price volatility across international markets.For road transport, the implications are immediate. Diesel remains the primary fuel for most commercial fleets across Europe; sudden price increases can quickly affect operating margins.Early signals of this shift are already visible. According to, Spain’s carrier federation Fenadismer reports that in the 10 days following the outbreak of the conflict in Iran, diesel prices in Spain rose by more than 30%, reaching about €1.80 per litre.For haulage operators, this kind of volatility creates difficult planning conditions. Fuel often represents one of the largest operational costs for a fleet, and sudden increases can affect everything from freight rates to contract negotiations.Insurance markets respond quickly when geopolitical risks escalate.When tensions rise in maritime corridors, insurers may or otherwise alter policy wording. Ships travelling through or near those areas face higher premiums or additional surcharges for each voyage.These costs rarely remain confined to the shipping sector. Instead, they are passed through the logistics chain in the form of higher freight rates and increased transportation costs.Another, less visible consequence of shipping disruption is the impact on container availability.Global shipping depends on the circulation of containers between ports. When vessels are rerouted onto longer journeys, and take more time to return to export hubs.Over time, this can create imbalances across the global container system.Ports receiving delayed or diverted vessels may also experience when ships arrive, while exporters in other regions may struggle to secure empty containers for outbound cargo.For European freight operators, these disruptions can translate into irregular cargo volumes and more unpredictable container collection schedules.The disruption around the Strait of Hormuz comes at a time when global shipping routes are already under pressure.Since late 2023, instability in the Red Sea corridor – particularly around the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and the southern entrance to the Suez Canal – has forced many shipping companies to divert vessels away from the region.In response, numerous carriers began rerouting ships around the Cape of Good Hope, adding significant time to journeys between Asia and Europe.Now, with tensions affecting traffic near the Strait of Hormuz as well, the pressure on international shipping routes is intensifying.The combined disruption of the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea illustrates how dependent global logistics remains on a small number of maritime chokepoints. The Strait of Hormuz is critical for the global flow of oil and energy products. The Red Sea and Suez Canal corridor, meanwhile, is the primary maritime gateway for containerised goods moving between Asia and Europe.When instability affects either corridor individually, shipping networks can usually adapt by adjusting schedules or rerouting vessels.With the Red Sea still heavily disrupted and traffic through the Strait of Hormuz now sharply reduced, the system becomes far less flexible.With fewer safe passages available, containers on affected services remain in transit for longer period, tightening availability on some trade lanes.Although these disruptions start at sea, their consequences are ultimately felt on Europe’s roads.Fleet operators may encounter:Energy market instability can drive rapid changes in diesel prices.Delayed cargo arrivals can put pressure on logistics providers to move goods more quickly once shipments reach port.Insurance premiums, longer shipping routes, rising fuel prices and surcharges all contribute to increased transportation costs.Events around the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea highlight a growing reality for global logistics: supply chains now operate in an environment where geopolitical risk can quickly reshape trade routes.“Global logistics has always been interconnected, but events like these show just how disruption can reshape logistics networks,” says Nick Renton, Head of European Strategy & Business Development at SNAP. “Even when the initial crisis occurs thousands of miles away, the effects soon reach European supply chains through fuel prices, shipping delays and tighter delivery windows.“The fleets that adapt most effectively are those that plan for uncertainty – with flexible routes, better information and and rest when schedules change.”With access to reliable information and trusted truck parking across Europe, SNAP helps fleets and drivers stay flexible, plan ahead and keep journeys moving.

Header Image

onsdag 15 april 2026 • Nyheder om industrien

TYVERI AF GODS I EUROPA: HVORFOR DET STIGER, OG HVORDAN FLÅDER KAN REDUCERE RISIKOEN

Guest

Cargo theft is a growing threat across Europe. What was once seen as an occasional disruption is now a more persistent and organised risk to road transport, affecting fleets, drivers and the wider supply chain. Reported losses and incidents have risen sharply, with one widely cited industry figure pointing to a in recent years. In alone, 557 cargo crimes were recorded across 38 countries in the TAPA EMEA Intelligence System, and even though values were disclosed for fewer than one in five incidents, those 100 cases still totalled more than €43 million.In this article, we explore the current trends and what fleet managers and operators can do to minimise their risks.Food and beverage shipments are among the most commonly targeted categories in Europe, accounting for . also rank highly. These goods are attractive because they are easy to move, easy to sell and often difficult to trace once they enter secondary markets.The recent on its way from Italy to Poland is a useful example. Nestlé said the missing load amounted to roughly 413,793 bars, showing how quickly a mainstream consumer shipment can become a target when moving across borders.These shipments are attractive targets for organised groups because they can be offloaded quickly, resulting in rapid returns. Cargo crime often happens while loads are moving. report found that hijackings accounted for 21% of incidents, while 41% of thefts happened in transit. That is a reminder that risk does not begin when a truck parks for the night. It can begin long before a vehicle stops for the night, particularly on exposed corridors or routes where load visibility and security controls are weaker.Parked vehicles remain a major point of vulnerability. In the UK, Munich Re reported that nearly half of all thefts take place at unsecured roadside parking and rest areas. Across Europe, unsecured roadside locations and rest areas continue to feature prominently in cargo crime reporting, especially where drivers have limited alternatives and secure sites are full.Some of the most concerning incidents show coordination. recently documented attacks in Germany in which dozens of trucks were targeted in a single night along the A1 corridor. In one November 2023 incident, 67 trucks had trailers slashed at service and rest areas including Ostetal South and Grundbergsee South. Similar attacks had already taken place on the same route months earlier.Germany remains one of the clearest hotspots, largely because of the scale of freight passing through the country. Analysis showed that in 2023, more than double France in second place. Other recurring hotspots include France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. That pattern reflects the reality of European freight movement. Dense logistics networks, major freight hubs and heavily used motorways create more opportunities for organised criminals, especially when secure parking capacity fails to keep pace with demand.Munich Re warns that cargo thieves are increasingly using more sophisticated methods, including identity deception, cyber-enabled scams and other tactics that bypass traditional controls. Wider points to GPS jamming, paperwork manipulation and shipment diversion as part of that shift.A stolen load may now begin with compromised data, a fraudulent carrier, a diverted instruction or a vehicle whose movements can no longer be tracked properly. For fleets, that means theft prevention now involves more than physical security. It also requires tighter dispatch processes, better control over shipment data and clearer real-time visibility.The most obvious impact is financial. Stolen goods lead to lost goods, insurance claims and disruption. But the direct value of the missing load is only part of the problem. Delayed deliveries, vehicle damage, missed slots and customer dissatisfaction can all push the true cost much higher. There is also a human cost. Drivers may face intimidation, confrontation or the shock of discovering that their vehicle has been tampered with while they were resting. Even where there is no direct violence, exposure to insecure roadside stops creates stress, fatigue and a sense of vulnerability that can affect driver welfare and retention. Operationally, the knock-on effects spread quickly through the supply chain. A single theft can mean missed delivery windows, rerouted vehicles, stock shortages and added pressure on already stretched teams. For temperature-sensitive, time-critical or high-value loads, the consequences can multiply fast.There is no single fix, but fleets can reduce exposure with a more structured approach to planning, parking and security.Secure parking remains one of the clearest areas for improvement. TAPA’s Parking Security Requirements framework provides an internationally recognised benchmark for secure truck parking, helping operators assess which locations offer stronger protection for vehicles, loads and drivers. Choosing accredited sites will not eliminate cargo theft, but it can significantly reduce the opportunity for organised criminals to strike.In practice, that may mean stopping earlier than planned to reach a safer site rather than pushing on to an unsecured lay-by. While that can feel less efficient in the moment, it is often the more resilient choice.For fleets, the challenge is not just knowing secure parking matters but being able to access it easily. SNAP helps bridge that gap by giving drivers and operators better visibility of trusted parking options across the UK and Europe, making it simpler to plan and reserve safer stops from the outset.Read more: Cybersecurity now sits alongside physical security in any serious theft-prevention strategy. Tracking, geofencing and anti-jamming tools can all help, but only if they are backed by clear processes. Fleets should review how shipment data is shared, who can alter route instructions, how delivery paperwork is verified and what happens if a vehicle suddenly disappears from view. Drivers are often the last line of defence, but they should not carry the burden alone. Clear escalation procedures, regular check-ins, secure rest planning and training on suspicious activity all matter. One of the biggest structural issues behind cargo theft is the shortage of secure truck parking. When drivers cannot find protected sites with proper lighting, access control and welfare facilities, they are more likely to end up in the very locations thieves are already targeting. SNAP has trained working to accredit more parking sites across the UK and continental Europe, helping expand the availability of secure truck parking and reduce opportunities for organised theft.For fleets, the challenge is not just understanding risk, but building safer stopping decisions into everyday operations. At SNAP, we help drivers and operators identify trusted parking options across the UK and Europe, making it easier to plan routes with security and driver welfare in mind.