Guest
Industrijske novice • 9 min branja

Gorivo proti polnjenju: Je prehod na elektriko cenejši ali le bolj zelen?

Ustvarjeno: 28. 07. 2025

Posodobljeno: 19. 09. 2025

Razmah električnih polnilnih postaj za težka tovorna vozila po vsej Evropi je povzročil prehodno obdobje na obsežnih cestnih omrežjih celine. Številni upravljavci voznih parkov in vozniki še vedno uporabljajo klasična tovorna vozila na dizelski pogon. Vendar se zaradi nadaljnjega razvoja panoge obeta prehod na električna težka tovorna vozila.

Za oceno izvedljivosti prehoda upravljavcev voznega parka z dizelskega na električni pogon je SNAP pripravil raziskavo o stroških polnjenja težkih tovornih vozil v primerjavi s polnjenjem na različnih evropskih tovornih poteh. Izračunali smo prihranke električne energije v primerjavi z dizelskim gorivom v evrih na 100 km v 35 evropskih državah.

Ugotovili smo, da je Islandija vodilna s povprečnim prihrankom stroškov v višini 61,03 EUR na 100 km, nordijske države Norveška in Finska pa so na drugem oziroma tretjem mestu po višini prihrankov. Na drugi strani lestvice je najmanj stroškov prihranila Hrvaška, in sicer 19,96 EUR na 100 km, sledita pa ji Ciper in Moldavija.

V tem članku razkrivamo prihranke stroškov po evropskih državah in analiziramo nekatere prihranke stroškov po evropskih državah ter analiziramo nekatere zunanje dejavnike, ki bi lahko vplivali na te prihranke. Poglobimo se tudi v to, kakšna je lahko prihodnost vozil eHGV v Evropi ter kako lahko vozila eHGV pomagajo upravljavcem voznih parkov in voznikom prihraniti denar, zlasti pri vozniških proračunih.

Kako se stroški vozil eHGV in dizelskega goriva gibljejo po EU

Naša raziskava je pokazala, da je v vseh preučevanih evropskih državah uporaba eHGV z električnim polnjenjem prihranila denar v primerjavi z uporabo tradicionalnega težkega tovornega vozila z gorivom. Glavna razlika je bila v tem, koliko so se prihranki stroškov razlikovali. Na primer, cena električne energije v najdražji državi, Islandiji, je 206 % višja (41 EUR) kot v najcenejši državi, Hrvaški.

Ugotovili smo, da bo voznik električnega tovornega vozila v primerjavi z voznikom dizelskega tovornega vozila v povprečju prihranil 30,59 EUR na 100 km. To pomeni, da vozniki električnih težkih tovornih vozil na dolge razdalje v povprečju prihranijo 37 200 EUR* na leto, vozniki na domačem trgu pa 24 800 EUR*.

Pri zbiranju podatkov smo pregledali 35 evropskih držav in primerjali stroške energije ali goriva na 100 km za dve vrsti težkih tovornih vozil (HGV). Šlo je za standardno dizelsko težko tovorno vozilo, pri katerem je poraba goriva znašala 35 litrov na 100 km po povprečni maloprodajni ceni dizelskega goriva v vsaki državi, in električno težko tovorno vozilo, pri katerem je poraba električne energije znašala 108 kWh na 100 km na podlagi povprečne cene električne energije za negospodinjstva. DDV in vračljivi davki so bili iz teh izračunov izključeni. Primerjava odraža samo neposredne stroške "na črpalki" ali "na vtičnici" brez upoštevanja dejavnikov, kot so velikost voznega parka, sklenjene pogodbe o dobavi energije ali prihodnje spremembe cen goriva in električne energije.

Pri raziskovanju cen dizelskega goriva in električne energije so bili uporabljeni številni viri, med drugim Eurostat, CEIC, GlobalPetrolPrices, Webfleet in Gov.uk. Opozoriti velja, da se nekateri od teh virov nanašajo na "Veliko Britanijo", drugi pa na "Združeno kraljestvo". Za namene te raziskave sta bila oba izraza obravnavana kot zamenljiva.

Države, ki s prehodom na električna tovorna vozila prihranijo največ

Islandija (61,03 EUR), Norveška (49,31 EUR) in Finska (49,12 EUR) so trenutno države, v katerih je mogoče največ prihraniti s prehodom na električna tovorna vozila.

To je predvsem posledica tega, da so te države med najdražjimi v Evropi za dizelsko gorivo. Islandija je najdražja država v Evropi za dizelsko gorivo (2,07 EUR na liter). Ta visoka cena je v veliki meri posledica geografske izoliranosti v primerjavi s preostalo Evropo, zaradi česar so stroški uvoza dizelskega goriva veliko višji kot v drugih evropskih državah. Islandija je tako kot Norveška in Finska znana tudi po visoki davčni stopnji, ki prav tako prispeva k visokim stroškom goriva.

Norveška (32 %) in Islandija (18 %) sta prav tako dve državi na vrhu na svetu po deležu električnih avtomobilov na cestah med vsemi osebnimi avtomobili na cestah. Zato sta obe državi veliko vlagali v infrastrukturo za polnjenje električnih avtomobilov.

Islandija je majhna in ima glavno obvoznico, zato je tudi lažje v rednih časovnih presledkih namestiti električne polnilne postaje za voznike električnih tovornih vozil. Enako utemeljitev lahko delno uporabimo tudi za druge države z manjšimi omrežji, ki imajo visoko stopnjo prihrankov stroškov, vključno z Albanijo, Srbijo in Belgijo - čeprav je treba opozoriti, da imajo vse tri tudi nekatere od najdražjih cen dizelskega goriva v Evropi, kar prispeva k razliki v prihrankih stroškov.

Spodnja tabela prikazuje 10 držav z največjimi prihranki pri uporabi električnih tovornih vozil:

"Vozniki po vsej Evropi že varčujejo s prehodom na električna tovorna vozila. Prehod na polnjenje električnih tovornih vozil je prihodnost panoge in SNAP je pripravljen pomagati voznikom in upravljavcem voznih parkov pri tem prehodu. "

Matthew Bellamy - upravni direktor v podjetju SNAP

Države, ki s prehodom na električna tovorna vozila prihranijo najmanj

Hrvaška (19,96 EUR), Ciper (21,16 EUR) in Moldavija (22,72 EUR) so trenutno tri države z najnižjimi prihranki v Evropi.

Hrvaška ima drugo najpočasnejšo stopnjo uporabe električnih vozil v EU, takoj za Poljsko. Deloma je to posledica slabe hrvaške infrastrukture za polnjenje električnih vozil, kot so polnilne postaje, pri katerih je treba poklicati službo za pomoč uporabnikom ali uporabiti več različnih aplikacij za začetek postopka polnjenja, slabe usmeritve za polnilne postaje zunaj glavnih avtocest in potencialno dolge čakalne dobe na vrhuncu turistične sezone. Poleg tega na Hrvaškem ni polnilnih postaj za zelo visoke hitrosti (180 kW in več), kar je lahko težava za električna težka tovorna vozila, ki potrebujejo več energije kot povprečno električno vozilo.

Ciper in Moldavija imata notranja geopolitična vprašanja, ki otežujejo načrtovanje infrastrukture za polnjenje električnih vozil (kot tudi nacionalno načrtovanje na splošno). Na Cipru je severna polovica otoka - vključno s polovico glavnega mesta Nikozija - od leta 1974 okupirana s strani Turške republike Severni Ciper, ki jo podpira Turčija. Za Moldavijo vzhodna pokrajina Pridnestrje deluje kot dejanska država z lastno vlado. To pomeni, da obe državi ne moreta dosledno izvajati infrastrukture EV na ozemlju, ki ga štejeta za svoje.

Težave na Cipru so še večje zaradi visokih stroškov električne energije, medtem ko so cene dizelskega goriva v Moldaviji pete najcenejše v Evropi. Moldavija je tudi druga najrevnejša država v Evropi, zaradi česar so naložbe v infrastrukturo za električna vozila velik izziv. Vsi ti dejavniki prispevajo k nizkim splošnim prihrankom pri stroških električnih tovornih vozil.

Tudi Poljska je nizko na seznamu s prihrankom stroškov v višini 24,22 EUR. Kljub impresivni gospodarski rasti in vse večjim naložbam v infrastrukturo za polnjenje električnih vozil je pokritost na nekaterih območjih države še vedno problematična, čeprav se bo to v prihodnosti verjetno spremenilo (https://alternative-fuels-observatory.ec.europa.eu/general-information/news/poland-launches-major-funding-programs-zero-emission-transport).

Države, kot so Španija (32,20 EUR), Romunija (30,62 EUR) in Irska (30,54 EUR), so na sredini poti, ko gre za prihranek stroškov za električna tovorna vozila. To je verjetno posledica tega, da imajo te države vedno bolj razvito infrastrukturo za polnjenje električnih vozil ter srednje visoke cene električne energije in dizelskega goriva.

Spodnja tabela prikazuje 10 držav, v katerih so prihranki pri uporabi električnih tovornih vozil najnižji:

Prihranki stroškov električnih tovornih vozil v Združenem kraljestvu

V Združenem kraljestvu so prihranki pri stroških električnih tovornih vozil znašali 36,23 EUR, kar ga uvršča na 11. mesto na svetu po prihrankih pri stroških polnjenja na 100 km. To je predvsem posledica visokih cen goriva v Združenem kraljestvu, saj so cene dizla tretje najdražje v Evropi. Čeprav prihranki zaradi visokih cen dizelskega goriva vsekakor prispevajo k visokim prihrankom pri stroških eHGV v Združenem kraljestvu, bi bili ti verjetno veliko višji, če električna energija v Združenem kraljestvu ne bi bila tudi med najdražjimi v Evropi.

Tudi v Združenem kraljestvu pričakujejo izboljšanje infrastrukture za polnjenje električnih vozil. Britansko podjetje Moto, ki se ukvarja s storitvami na avtocestah, aktivno načrtuje izgradnjo 15 "superhub" do leta 2027. Ti superhubi lahko učinkoviteje kot standardne polnilnice za električna vozila prilagodijo polnjenje električnih vozil eHGV. Na britanskih cestah je trenutno manj kot pet posebnih polnilnih mest za vozila eHGV. Ker nameravajo vlagati tudi druga podjetja, kot sta BP Pulse in Aegis Energy, se zdi verjetno, da bo Združeno kraljestvo v bližnji prihodnosti imelo precej izboljšano omrežje za polnjenje težkih tovornih vozil.

Kaj vpliva na elektrifikacijo težkih tovornih vozil?

Na elektrifikacijo težkih tovornih vozil trenutno vpliva več dejavnikov, vključno s pomanjkanjem polnilne infrastrukture, dolgim časom polnjenja, visokimi začetnimi stroški predelave eHGV in njihovim omejenim dosegom. Poleg tega so zaradi razmeroma nizkih stroškov in dostopnosti dizelskega goriva in vozil tradicionalna težka tovorna vozila privlačna možnost za [upravljavce voznih parkov] (https://snapacc.com/fleet-operators/).

Vendar se vsi ti vplivi lahko razlikujejo glede na državo delovanja. Na primer, če vaš vozni park obratuje le na domačem trgu v državi, kot sta Norveška ali Islandija, bo verjetno manj prizadet kot vozni park, ki obratuje po vsej Evropi ali v regijah s slabšo infrastrukturo eHGV, na primer na Balkanu.

Nezadostna infrastruktura za polnjenje

Glavna ovira za elektrifikacijo težkih tovornih vozil je nezadostna infrastruktura za polnjenje eHGV. To je zato, ker vozila eHGV zahtevajo megavatno polnjenje, ki ga večina obstoječih polnilnih mest za osebna vozila (standardni električni avtomobili in kombiji) ne podpira.

V Evropi je veliko držav, v katerih takšne infrastrukture zelo primanjkuje, zlasti na glavnih tovornih poteh in postajališčih za tovornjake. To so običajno revnejše države v južni in vzhodni Evropi, kot so Moldavija, Gruzija in Bolgarija. Ni naključje, da se te države uvrščajo v spodnjo deseterico držav, kjer se prihranijo stroški z eHGV.

Lahko se tudi zgodi, da polnilne postaje za vozila eHGV obstajajo, vendar so na območjih, ki zaradi šibkega lokalnega električnega omrežja preprosto ne morejo sprejeti več vozil eHGV, ki se polnijo čez noč. To je pogosto težava v bolj podeželskih in oddaljenih delih Evrope.

Čeprav mnoge evropske države načrtujejo izboljšanje infrastrukture za eHGV, je to še vedno dolgotrajen in drag proces s številnimi birokratskimi, logističnimi in tehničnimi ovirami, ki jih je treba premagati - da ne omenjamo okoliških infrastrukturnih posodobitev, kot so povezave z lokalnim omrežjem, ki bodo prav tako potrebne.

Dolgi časi polnjenja

Električna tovorna vozila se polnijo veliko dlje kot standardna električna vozila. To pomeni, da se morajo pogosto polniti čez noč. Tudi če je mogoče pridobiti hitre polnilnice za vozila eHGV, postopek še vedno traja vsaj dve uri in ne le nekaj minut, kot je to značilno za bencinska vozila.

Ta dolgi čas polnjenja ima lahko za upravljavce voznih parkov posledice v smislu časa obratovanja. V panogi, kjer so urniki in roki za dostavo zelo kratki, je to lahko škodljivo za poslovno uspešnost.

Omejena ponudba vozil eHGV

Električna težka tovorna vozila so omejena tudi zaradi relativno omejenega dosega v primerjavi s kilometrskim dosegom, ki ga omogočajo tradicionalna težka tovorna vozila. Po podatkih podjetja Safety Shield ima tipično električno težko tovorno vozilo z enim polnjenjem doseg približno 300 milj (približno razdalja od Londona do Rotterdama). Tipično težko tovorno vozilo na dizelski pogon pa lahko z enim rezervoarjem goriva prevozi do 1000 milj (približno razdalja od Londona do Varšave).

Na prevožene kilometre električnih tovornih vozil lahko bolj vplivajo tudi zunanji dejavniki, kot so obremenitev, hladno vreme in teren. To lahko pri voznikih povzroči tesnobo glede dosega, zato se lahko pogosteje polnijo, da bi si zagotovili dovolj energije za prihod na cilj. To pa lahko privede do zamud pri dostavi, zlasti pri vožnji skozi države s slabo infrastrukturo za polnjenje vozil eHGV.

Zaradi vsega tega je optimizacija poti ključnega pomena za upravljavce voznih parkov, ki načrtujejo vožnje za svoja vozila eHGV. Opozoriti je treba, da se tehnologija baterij nenehno razvija in da se bo v bližnji prihodnosti zmogljivost - in s tem število prevoženih kilometrov - še naprej izboljševala.

Visoki stroški eHGV

Začetni stroški eHGV so visoki (običajno med 160.000 in 200.000 funtov v primerjavi z 80.000 in 100.000 funtov za dizelsko težko tovorno vozilo), kar lahko odvrne neodvisne voznike in manjše upravljavce voznih parkov od tega, da bi si ga izposodili. Razlog za to je predvsem strošek tehnologije akumulatorjev. To pomeni, da bo nakup novega električnega težkega tovornega vozila drag, saj je tehnologija v njem dražja kot pri dizelskem težkem tovornem vozilu.

Visoki začetni stroški nakupa vozil eHGV pomenijo tudi, da se bodo upravljavci voznih parkov v državah s cenejšo električno energijo za polnjenje vozil eHGV, kot so Norveška, Švedska ali Finska, pogosteje odločali za prehod, saj se jim bo naložba povrnila hitreje kot upravljavcem v državah z drago električno energijo, kot sta Irska in Hrvaška.

Cene električne energije lahko nihajo tudi zaradi različnih dogodkov. V zadnjih petih letih so na primer cene električne energije nihale zaradi odpiranja gospodarstev po pandemiji COVID-19 in nato zaradi ruskega vdora v Ukrajino leta 2022 (zlasti slednji je imel velike posledice za evropsko oskrbo z energijo). Posledično je v obdobju po invaziji prišlo do skoraj 30-odstotnega skoka cen električne energije, in sicer z 20,5 c€/kWh, na 26,5 c€/kWh za povprečno prestolnico EU. Ker pa je povprečje EU zdaj nižje kot leta 2022, se zdi, da se bo električno polnjenje tovornih vozil še naprej krepilo.

V Evropi so povprečni stroški vožnje električnega tovornega vozila na razdalji 100 km 20,51 EUR, kar je bistveno manj kot stroški vožnje dizelskega tovornega vozila na isti razdalji, ki znašajo 51,10 EUR.

Z izboljšanjem učinkovitosti in razširjenostjo tehnologije baterij, ki je cenejša za proizvodnjo, bodo tudi vozila eHGV postala cenovno dostopnejša.

Cenovno ugodno in dostopno dizelsko gorivo

Dizelsko gorivo ima še vedno prevladujočo vlogo v industriji težkih tovornih vozil. To je zato, ker je infrastruktura za dizelsko gorivo v Evropi že desetletja dobro uveljavljena, zlasti v primerjavi z električnimi polnilnicami za težka tovorna vozila. Zaradi združljivosti dizelskega goriva s karticami za gorivo in njegove relativno nizke cene ostaja priljubljeno tudi pri upravljavcih voznih parkov tovornih vozil.

Tako kot pri električni energiji tudi vrednost dizelskega goriva po vsej celini niha. Zato se v državah, kot so Moldavija, Gruzija in Malta, kjer je dizelsko gorivo še vedno poceni, lahko zdi, da je ugodneje ostati pri dizelskih tovornih vozilih. V državah, kot sta Islandija in Nizozemska, kjer je dizelsko gorivo razmeroma drago, pa obstaja večja spodbuda za prehod na električna tovorna vozila.

Država s poceni gorivom bo morda tudi bolj zadržana pri obsežnih naložbah v infrastrukturo za eHGV, saj se boji, da bo odvrnila tradicionalne vozne parke težkih tovornih vozil, ki bodo zaradi tega morda izbrali alternativne poti.

Prihodnost električnih tovornih vozil v Evropi

Električna tovorna vozila so dolgoročna prihodnost cestnega tovornega prometa. Ne le, da je njihova uporaba sčasoma cenejša, temveč bodo zaradi hitrega vlaganja v novo infrastrukturo in njene izgradnje postala tudi finančno in strateško veliko bolj donosna.

Poleg gospodarskih koristi so električna tovorna vozila pomembna tudi zaradi svojega prispevka k okoljskim ciljem, kot je Net Zero. Tradicionalna težka tovorna vozila so velika onesnaževala, zato se bodo prihranjene emisije, ki jih bodo proizvedla eHGV, poznale v čistejšem zraku po vsej Evropi.

Naslednji trendi bodo v prihodnosti vplivali na električna tovorna vozila:

  • Smart truck parks: Truck parks in the future will evolve to better accommodate eHGVs alongside other smart technological advancements. These truck parks may include up-to-date ultra-fast charging stations, diagnostic machines, battery swap stations, and automated cleaning services, among other features.
  • Increased EU regulations: Low Emission Zones (LEZs) already exist in a number of cities (e.g. Paris, Berlin, and Milan) with more European cities likely to follow suit with more stringent EU transport regulations. Fleet operators may opt for eHGVs to meet EU regulations or retrofit their HGVs with cleaner technologies, like smart tachographs.
  • AI implementation: AI technology has already had a profound sustainability impact across road haulage — with applications in route optimisation, predictive maintenance, and autonomous vehicle development. Electric vehicles will likely incorporate AI to help drive sustainability in the haulage industry over the coming decades.
  • Sustainability: The shift to eHGVs is part of a wider global push toward sustainable living. The effects of extreme weather, including heatwaves and floods across Europe, show no sign of slowing due to climate change. Moving to electric HGVs is one way the world is reducing its dependence on fossil fuels.
  • Fuel variety: During the transition to cleaner fuel sources, there will be a variety of HGV types on the road throughout the 2030s. Many will be older diesel models, some will be electric, and others will be powered by alternative fuels such as biofuel made from renewable biomass sources.

Pametnejše upravljanje stroškov eHGV

Električna težka tovorna vozila so prihodnost, o tem ni dvoma. Zaradi ekonomskih in okoljskih koristi bo v prihodnjih letih vse več upravljavcev voznih parkov in voznikov prešlo na električna kombinirana vozila. Kako dolgo bo trajalo to prehodno obdobje, je odvisno od tega, kako hitro bo Evropa razvila svojo polnilno infrastrukturo za eHGV.

Trenutno so na celini velike površine, na katerih vozila eHGV niso izvedljiva in na katerih je zaradi krajšega dosega potrebna obsežna optimizacija poti. Poleg tega lahko začetni stroški odvračajo neodvisne voznike in manjše upravljavce voznih parkov.

Tehnologija in infrastruktura se bosta še naprej izboljševali, na voljo pa so že storitve, namenjene čim enostavnejšemu upravljanju voznih parkov eHGV in s tem povezanih stroškov. Od optimizacije poti in upravljanja voznega parka do zemljevidov za parkiranje in pranje tovornjakov - SNAP poenostavlja prevoz tovornjakov.

Prijavite se na SNAP še danes.

Delite z

Tudi drugi berejo...

Header Image

četrtek 30 april 2026 • Industrijske novice

NOVA GENERACIJA ZAPOSLOVANJA: PRIVABLJANJE MLAJŠIH TALENTOV V PANOGO TOVORNEGA PROMETA

Evelyn Long

The UK driver shortage is a familiar headline, but the real story is more complex than the numbers. It’s a fundamental shift in the workforce that requires a new mindset. While it’s a crisis, it’s also an opportunity for forward-thinking fleets to innovate and gain an edge over the competition. The companies that successfully attract the next generation of drivers will thrive in the coming decades. Here is a quick look at the forces fueling the disparity between retiring heavy goods vehicle (HGV) drivers and new apprentices. National unemployment figures are rising. In 2025, it climbed to leading up to December, the highest rate in nearly five years. At the same time, there is a severe shortage of professional drivers.The UK’s driver shortage is not a simple labor deficit. It is a skills shortage. Many barriers prevent the general unemployed population from filling the role, such as: ● High cost and time commitment for obtaining an HGV license● The requirement for a certificate of professional competence● The unique lifestyle demands that do not align with a standard 9-to-5 jobThe paradox of high unemployment and significant driver shortage is why industry bodies are not passively waiting for the job market to fix the problem. The government implemented , from enhancing the current supply chain’s efficiency to improving conditions to attract more drivers to the sector. The shortage is not solely due to a lack of new drivers. The industry is actively losing experienced professionals. While the proportion of businesses reporting vacancies has , the issue lies in the persistent hiring gap. Many are leaving for better pay or benefits elsewhere. Drivers may choose a warehouse job that offers a similar salary to their current one but provides predictable shifts and more social interactions. The physical and mental toll of long hours, social isolation and poor quality of roadside facilities are also push factors. Retirement is normal in any industry. The problem is that retiring drivers in the trucking sector are not being replaced at a comparable rate. This is a growing trend in many industrial industries, potentially pointing towards a larger societal shift towards these careers.The number of HGV drivers under the age of 35 between the third quarters of 2023 and 2024. Despite that, over 53% of the labor force across the industry is aged 50 years and older. Similarly, are 55 years or older. For industrial industries, this figure means a massive impending loss of experience, a shrinking pool of reliable talent and the risk of institutional knowledge walking out the door. The industry’s image is as significant a barrier as any practical challenge. The goal is to shift the narrative from the outdated “lonely trucker” stereotype to that of a “skilled logistics professional.” The first step to rebranding is to define what the job entails in the 21st century. Essentially, HGV professionals drive vehicles with a gross combined weight of , ensuring the safe and efficient delivery of products at the right time, location and condition. To attract young talent, fleet managers must acknowledge that most are seeking career paths and a sense of meaning. Recruiters can map out a visible career ladder to show that the role is not a “dead-end” job. For example, a path can look like a progression from lead driver to new apprentice mentor to transport planner to fleet manager. Connecting the job to a larger purpose is a sound strategy, as many of the younger generations want to make an impact. Link the driver's daily tasks to the bigger picture. Instead of stating how the job involves moving products, recruiters can highlight how the work ensures families have fresh food on their tables. Here are some changes fleet managers can adopt to become more effective employers.Ensure the apprenticeship program provides a modern, engaging and supportive experience. Pair apprentices with experienced drivers who are willing and trained to be mentors. Leverage technology in training. For example, programs can include high-fidelity driving simulators to allow apprentices to practice responding to hazardous conditions. The training must cover more than just passing the driving test. Include modules on customer service, financial literacy for potential owner-operators, in-cab technology and health and wellness courses for those on the road. Flexibility and predictability in scheduling are key attractors. Consider alternative models, such as: ● Hub-and-spoke: Drivers operate out of a local depot, handling the first and last leg of a journey and returning home daily. ● Relay systems: One driver takes a load from point A to a handover point B, where a second driver takes it to point C and so on. ● Fixed rotations: Implement schedules like “four days on, four days off” to provide solid, predictable blocks. Invest in the drivers’ comfort and safety to show them they are valued. There is a shortage of , which adds to the daily stress of drivers, wasted hours searching for safe parking and the risk of cargo theft. Fleet managers must ensure their depots are places professionals want to be, with clean, modern break rooms, showers and kitchens. Another impactful investment is to foster a culture of respect. Ensure dispatchers are supportive partners who help solve problems. Provide training for positive, respectful communication between drivers and the office to improve workforce satisfaction and retention.The shortage is a catalyst for necessary evolution. The fleets that will win the war for talent will be those that adapt their approach to modern drivers' expectations. Strategically rebranding the profession’s perception, modernizing practices and investing in real resources for driver welfare can set apart forward-thinking companies. The need for changes is challenging, but it’s also an exciting opportunity to build a stronger, more resilient workforce that will carry the UK haulage industry into the future. Discover more from

Header Image

torek 28 april 2026 • Industrijske novice

KAKO LAHKO NAPETOSTI OKROG IRANA VPLIVAJO NA EVROPSKO LOGISTIKO

Lucy Mowatt

Geopolitical conflict rarely stays confined to the region where it began. In global logistics, disruption in one part of the world can quickly ripple through supply chains thousands of kilometres away.That is the reality as tensions escalate around Iran and the Strait of Hormuz – a narrow shipping channel between Iran and Oman that serves as one of the world’s most important transport corridors.Roughly passes through the strait, alongside large volumes of liquefied natural gas and other commodities. When shipping through this corridor slows or stops, the consequences are felt around the world.For transport operators in Europe, the effects are already beginning to emerge through rising fuel costs, rerouted shipping traffic and growing uncertainty in global supply chains. have already begun avoiding routes close to the Strait of Hormuz due to that transit is not allowed and that the area is unsafe. Vessels passing through or caught up in military action. Instead, they are diverting vessels via the at the southern tip of Africa. Although this avoids high-risk zones, it also adds thousands of miles to many journeys.For global supply chains, the effects are clear: Longer transit times Increased fuel consumption for vessels Higher freight costs for cargo ownersWhat begins as a maritime disruption often ends up affecting inland logistics once delayed cargo finally reaches European ports. This creates a “feast or famine” effect: periods with little cargo to move followed by sudden surges when multiple vessels arrive at once.Energy markets have been shaken by activity in the Strait of Hormuz.Because the waterway handles such a large share of global oil exports, any disruption immediately affects expectations about future supply. Even short-term interruptions can cause price volatility across international markets.For road transport, the implications are immediate. Diesel remains the primary fuel for most commercial fleets across Europe; sudden price increases can quickly affect operating margins.Early signals of this shift are already visible. According to, Spain’s carrier federation Fenadismer reports that in the 10 days following the outbreak of the conflict in Iran, diesel prices in Spain rose by more than 30%, reaching about €1.80 per litre.For haulage operators, this kind of volatility creates difficult planning conditions. Fuel often represents one of the largest operational costs for a fleet, and sudden increases can affect everything from freight rates to contract negotiations.Insurance markets respond quickly when geopolitical risks escalate.When tensions rise in maritime corridors, insurers may or otherwise alter policy wording. Ships travelling through or near those areas face higher premiums or additional surcharges for each voyage.These costs rarely remain confined to the shipping sector. Instead, they are passed through the logistics chain in the form of higher freight rates and increased transportation costs.Another, less visible consequence of shipping disruption is the impact on container availability.Global shipping depends on the circulation of containers between ports. When vessels are rerouted onto longer journeys, and take more time to return to export hubs.Over time, this can create imbalances across the global container system.Ports receiving delayed or diverted vessels may also experience when ships arrive, while exporters in other regions may struggle to secure empty containers for outbound cargo.For European freight operators, these disruptions can translate into irregular cargo volumes and more unpredictable container collection schedules.The disruption around the Strait of Hormuz comes at a time when global shipping routes are already under pressure.Since late 2023, instability in the Red Sea corridor – particularly around the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and the southern entrance to the Suez Canal – has forced many shipping companies to divert vessels away from the region.In response, numerous carriers began rerouting ships around the Cape of Good Hope, adding significant time to journeys between Asia and Europe.Now, with tensions affecting traffic near the Strait of Hormuz as well, the pressure on international shipping routes is intensifying.The combined disruption of the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea illustrates how dependent global logistics remains on a small number of maritime chokepoints. The Strait of Hormuz is critical for the global flow of oil and energy products. The Red Sea and Suez Canal corridor, meanwhile, is the primary maritime gateway for containerised goods moving between Asia and Europe.When instability affects either corridor individually, shipping networks can usually adapt by adjusting schedules or rerouting vessels.With the Red Sea still heavily disrupted and traffic through the Strait of Hormuz now sharply reduced, the system becomes far less flexible.With fewer safe passages available, containers on affected services remain in transit for longer period, tightening availability on some trade lanes.Although these disruptions start at sea, their consequences are ultimately felt on Europe’s roads.Fleet operators may encounter:Energy market instability can drive rapid changes in diesel prices.Delayed cargo arrivals can put pressure on logistics providers to move goods more quickly once shipments reach port.Insurance premiums, longer shipping routes, rising fuel prices and surcharges all contribute to increased transportation costs.Events around the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea highlight a growing reality for global logistics: supply chains now operate in an environment where geopolitical risk can quickly reshape trade routes.“Global logistics has always been interconnected, but events like these show just how disruption can reshape logistics networks,” says Nick Renton, Head of European Strategy & Business Development at SNAP. “Even when the initial crisis occurs thousands of miles away, the effects soon reach European supply chains through fuel prices, shipping delays and tighter delivery windows.“The fleets that adapt most effectively are those that plan for uncertainty – with flexible routes, better information and and rest when schedules change.”With access to reliable information and trusted truck parking across Europe, SNAP helps fleets and drivers stay flexible, plan ahead and keep journeys moving.

Header Image

sreda 15 april 2026 • Industrijske novice

KRAJA TOVORA V EVROPI: ZAKAJ SE POVEČUJE IN KAKO LAHKO VOZNI PARKI ZMANJŠAJO TVEGANJE

Guest

Cargo theft is a growing threat across Europe. What was once seen as an occasional disruption is now a more persistent and organised risk to road transport, affecting fleets, drivers and the wider supply chain. Reported losses and incidents have risen sharply, with one widely cited industry figure pointing to a in recent years. In alone, 557 cargo crimes were recorded across 38 countries in the TAPA EMEA Intelligence System, and even though values were disclosed for fewer than one in five incidents, those 100 cases still totalled more than €43 million.In this article, we explore the current trends and what fleet managers and operators can do to minimise their risks.Food and beverage shipments are among the most commonly targeted categories in Europe, accounting for . also rank highly. These goods are attractive because they are easy to move, easy to sell and often difficult to trace once they enter secondary markets.The recent on its way from Italy to Poland is a useful example. Nestlé said the missing load amounted to roughly 413,793 bars, showing how quickly a mainstream consumer shipment can become a target when moving across borders.These shipments are attractive targets for organised groups because they can be offloaded quickly, resulting in rapid returns. Cargo crime often happens while loads are moving. report found that hijackings accounted for 21% of incidents, while 41% of thefts happened in transit. That is a reminder that risk does not begin when a truck parks for the night. It can begin long before a vehicle stops for the night, particularly on exposed corridors or routes where load visibility and security controls are weaker.Parked vehicles remain a major point of vulnerability. In the UK, Munich Re reported that nearly half of all thefts take place at unsecured roadside parking and rest areas. Across Europe, unsecured roadside locations and rest areas continue to feature prominently in cargo crime reporting, especially where drivers have limited alternatives and secure sites are full.Some of the most concerning incidents show coordination. recently documented attacks in Germany in which dozens of trucks were targeted in a single night along the A1 corridor. In one November 2023 incident, 67 trucks had trailers slashed at service and rest areas including Ostetal South and Grundbergsee South. Similar attacks had already taken place on the same route months earlier.Germany remains one of the clearest hotspots, largely because of the scale of freight passing through the country. Analysis showed that in 2023, more than double France in second place. Other recurring hotspots include France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. That pattern reflects the reality of European freight movement. Dense logistics networks, major freight hubs and heavily used motorways create more opportunities for organised criminals, especially when secure parking capacity fails to keep pace with demand.Munich Re warns that cargo thieves are increasingly using more sophisticated methods, including identity deception, cyber-enabled scams and other tactics that bypass traditional controls. Wider points to GPS jamming, paperwork manipulation and shipment diversion as part of that shift.A stolen load may now begin with compromised data, a fraudulent carrier, a diverted instruction or a vehicle whose movements can no longer be tracked properly. For fleets, that means theft prevention now involves more than physical security. It also requires tighter dispatch processes, better control over shipment data and clearer real-time visibility.The most obvious impact is financial. Stolen goods lead to lost goods, insurance claims and disruption. But the direct value of the missing load is only part of the problem. Delayed deliveries, vehicle damage, missed slots and customer dissatisfaction can all push the true cost much higher. There is also a human cost. Drivers may face intimidation, confrontation or the shock of discovering that their vehicle has been tampered with while they were resting. Even where there is no direct violence, exposure to insecure roadside stops creates stress, fatigue and a sense of vulnerability that can affect driver welfare and retention. Operationally, the knock-on effects spread quickly through the supply chain. A single theft can mean missed delivery windows, rerouted vehicles, stock shortages and added pressure on already stretched teams. For temperature-sensitive, time-critical or high-value loads, the consequences can multiply fast.There is no single fix, but fleets can reduce exposure with a more structured approach to planning, parking and security.Secure parking remains one of the clearest areas for improvement. TAPA’s Parking Security Requirements framework provides an internationally recognised benchmark for secure truck parking, helping operators assess which locations offer stronger protection for vehicles, loads and drivers. Choosing accredited sites will not eliminate cargo theft, but it can significantly reduce the opportunity for organised criminals to strike.In practice, that may mean stopping earlier than planned to reach a safer site rather than pushing on to an unsecured lay-by. While that can feel less efficient in the moment, it is often the more resilient choice.For fleets, the challenge is not just knowing secure parking matters but being able to access it easily. SNAP helps bridge that gap by giving drivers and operators better visibility of trusted parking options across the UK and Europe, making it simpler to plan and reserve safer stops from the outset.Read more: Cybersecurity now sits alongside physical security in any serious theft-prevention strategy. Tracking, geofencing and anti-jamming tools can all help, but only if they are backed by clear processes. Fleets should review how shipment data is shared, who can alter route instructions, how delivery paperwork is verified and what happens if a vehicle suddenly disappears from view. Drivers are often the last line of defence, but they should not carry the burden alone. Clear escalation procedures, regular check-ins, secure rest planning and training on suspicious activity all matter. One of the biggest structural issues behind cargo theft is the shortage of secure truck parking. When drivers cannot find protected sites with proper lighting, access control and welfare facilities, they are more likely to end up in the very locations thieves are already targeting. SNAP has trained working to accredit more parking sites across the UK and continental Europe, helping expand the availability of secure truck parking and reduce opportunities for organised theft.For fleets, the challenge is not just understanding risk, but building safer stopping decisions into everyday operations. At SNAP, we help drivers and operators identify trusted parking options across the UK and Europe, making it easier to plan routes with security and driver welfare in mind.