Guest
Industry News • 9 min read

Fuel vs charge: Is the switch to electric cheaper or just greener?

Created: 28/07/2025

Updated: 19/09/2025

The growth of electric charging stations across Europe for HGVs has led to a transitional period across the continent's vast road networks. For many fleet operators and drivers, classic diesel-fuelled HGVs are still the transport of choice. However, the shift to electric HGVs is looming, as the industry continues to evolve.

To assess the feasibility of fleet operators switching from diesel to electric, SNAP has authored research into the costs of recharging HGVs vs refuelling them across various European freight routes. We calculated the electricity versus diesel savings in euros per 100 km across 35 European countries.

We found that Iceland led the way with an average cost saving of €61.03 per 100 km, with fellow Nordic countries Norway and Finland offering the second and third highest cost savings respectively. At the other end of the scale, Croatia offered the least amount of cost savings with €19.96 per 100 km, followed by Cyprus and Moldova.

In this article, we uncover the cost savings per European country and analyses some of the cost savings per European country and analyses some of the external factors that may be influencing these savings. We also dive into what the future of eHGVs in Europe may look like as well as how eHGVs can help fleet operators and drivers save money, particularly with driver budgets.

How the eHGV and diesel costs stack up across the EU

Our research found that for every European country investigated, using an eHGV with electric charging saved money when compared to using a traditional HGV with fuel. The primary difference was just how much the cost savings varied. For example, the price for electricity in the most expensive country, Iceland is 206% higher (41 euros higher) than the least expensive country, Croatia.

We found that on average, a driver with an electric HGV will save €30.59 per 100 km when compared with a diesel HGV driver. This translates to an estimated average saving of €37,200 a year for long-haul electric HGV drivers and €24,800 for domestic drivers.

To compile our data, we looked at 35 European countries and compared the energy or fuel cost per 100 km for two types of heavy goods vehicles (HGVs). These were a standard diesel HGV, assuming fuel consumption of 35 litres per 100 km at each country's average retail diesel price, and an electric HGV, assuming electricity use of 108 kWh per 100 km based on the average non-household electricity rate. VAT and recoverable taxes were excluded from these calculations. The comparison reflects direct “at-the-pump” or “at-the-plug” costs only, without accounting for factors such as fleet size, negotiated energy contracts, or future changes in fuel and electricity prices.

When researching the pricing for diesel and electricity, a number of sources were drawn from, including Eurostat, CEIC, GlobalPetrolPrices, Webfleet, and Gov.uk. It is worth noting that some of these sources refer to ‘Great Britain’ while others refer to the ‘UK’. For the purposes of this research, both terms were treated interchangeably.

Countries saving the most by converting to electric HGVs

Iceland (€61.03), Norway (€49.31), and Finland (€49.12) are currently the countries where the most can be saved by converting to an electric HGV.

This is largely due to these countries ranking among the most expensive in Europe for diesel. Iceland ranks as the most expensive country in Europe for diesel (€2.07 per litre). This steep cost largely comes from its geographical isolation compared with the rest of Europe, leaving the cost of importing diesel much higher than that of other European nations. Iceland, like Norway and Finland, is also known for its high tax rate, which also contributes to its high fuel cost.

Norway (32%) and Iceland (18%) also make up the top two countries in the world for electric cars on the road as a share of passenger cars on the road. As a result, both countries have invested significantly in electric charging infrastructure.

Iceland’s small size and main ring road also make it easier to install electric charging stations at regular intervals for electric HGV drivers. The same reasoning can be partly used for other countries with smaller networks that have a high rate of cost savings, including Albania, Serbia, and Belgium — although it should be noted that all three also have some of the most expensive diesel prices in Europe, which contributes to the difference in cost savings.

The chart below shows the top 10 countries that have the largest cost savings when using an electric HGV:

“Drivers across Europe are already saving by switching to electric HGVs. Switching to eHGV charging is the future of the industry and SNAP is ready to help drivers and fleet operators in the transition.”

Matthew Bellamy - Managing Director at SNAP

Countries saving the least by converting to electric HGVs

Croatia (€19.96), Cyprus (€21.16), and Moldova (€22.72) are currently the three countries with the lowest cost savings in Europe.

Croatia has the second slowest EV adoption rate in the EU after Poland. This is partly because of Croatia's poor EV charging infrastructure, such as charging stations that require ringing customer service or use multiple different apps to start the charging process, poor directions for charging stations outside major highways, and potentially high wait times during peak tourist season. Additionally, Croatia lacks ultra-high-speed charging stations (180 kW and above), which can prove a problem for electric HGVs that require more power than the average EV.

Both Cyprus and Moldova have internal geopolitical issues that make infrastructure planning for EV charging (as well as national planning in general) difficult. For Cyprus, the northern half of the island — including half of its capital, Nicosia — has been occupied by the Turkish-backed Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus since 1974. For Moldova, the eastern province of Transnistria acts as a de facto state with its own government. This means that both countries are unable to implement EV infrastructure in a consistent way across the territory they consider their own.

The issues in Cyprus are also compounded by high electricity costs, while Moldova has the fifth cheapest diesel prices in Europe. Moldova is also the second poorest country in Europe, making investment in EV infrastructure a challenge. All these factors contribute to an overall low cost saving for electric HGVs.

Poland is also low on the list with a cost saving of €24.22. Despite its impressive economic growth and growing investment in EV charging infrastructure, its large size means that coverage is still an issue in certain areas of the country — although this looks likely to change in the future.

Countries such as Spain (€32.20), Romania (€30.62), and Ireland (€30.54) occupy the middle of the road when it comes to cost saving for electric HGVs. This is likely due to these countries have growing EV charging infrastructure, and mid-priced electricity and diesel costs.

The chart below shows the top 10 countries that have the lowest cost savings when using an electric HGV:

UK’s electric HGV cost savings

The UK has an eHGV cost saving of €36.23, which places it 11th overall for cost savings from recharging per 100 km. This is largely due to how expensive UK fuel prices are, with diesel prices being the third most expensive in Europe. Although the savings from high diesel costs certainly contribute to the UK’s high eHGV costs savings, it would likely be far higher if the electricity in the UK were not also amongst the most expensive in Europe.

The UK is also expecting improvements to its EV charging infrastructure. The UK motorway service company, Moto is actively planning to build 15 ‘superhubs’ by 2027. These superhubs can better accommodate EV charging for eHGVs more efficiently than a standard EV charger. There are currently fewer than five eHGV-dedicated charging points on UK roads. With other companies like BP Pulse and Aegis Energy also looking to invest, it looks likely that the UK will have a much-improved HGV charging network in the near future.

What is impacting HGV electrification?

There are several factors currently impacting HGV electrification, including a lack of charging infrastructure, long charge times, the high initial costs of eHGV conversion, and their limited range. Additionally, the comparatively low cost and accessibility of diesel fuel and vehicles make traditional HGVs an attractive option for fleet operators.

However, all these impacts can vary depending on the country of operation. For example, if your fleet only runs domestically in a country such as Norway or Iceland, then it is likely to be less affected than a fleet operating across Europe or in regions with poorer eHGV infrastructure, such as the Balkans.

Insufficient charging infrastructure

The main obstacle to HGV electrification is insufficient eHGV charging infrastructure. This is because eHGVs require megawatt-scale charging, which most existing EV charging points for passenger vehicles (standard electric cars and vans) do not support.

There are many countries in Europe that severely lack such infrastructure, especially on major freight routes and at truck stops. These tend to be poorer states in southern and eastern Europe such as Moldova, Georgia, and Bulgaria. It is no coincidence that these states rank in the bottom 10 for eHGV cost savings.

It can also be the case that eHGV charging stations do exist, but they are in areas that simply can’t accommodate multiple eHGVs charging overnight due to a weak local power grid. This is often a problem in more rural and remote parts of Europe.

Although many European countries are planning to improve eHGV infrastructure, it is still a time-consuming and expensive process, with numerous bureaucratic, logistical, and technical obstacles to overcome — not to mention the surrounding infrastructure upgrades, such as local grid connections, that will also be needed.

Long charging times

Electric HGVs take far longer to charge than standard EVs. This means that charging must often take place overnight. Even if rapid eHGV chargers can be acquired, the process still takes at least two hours, rather than a few minutes, as is the case with petrol vehicles.

This long charging time can have a knock-on effect for fleet operators in terms of turnaround times. In an industry with tight delivery schedules and deadlines, this can be potentially detrimental to business performance.

Limited range of eHGVs

Electric HGVs are also constricted by their relatively limited range compared to the mileage afforded by traditional HGVs. According to Safety Shield, a typical electric HGV has a range of around 300 miles on a single charge (roughly the distance from London to Rotterdam). A typical diesel-powered HGV, however, can travel up to 1,000 miles on a single tank of fuel (roughly the distance from London to Warsaw).

Electric HGV mileage can also be more affected by external factors such as load, cold weather, and terrain. This can lead to range anxiety for drivers, who may conduct more frequent charges to ensure they have enough power to reach their destination. This, in turn, can lead to delivery delays, especially when driving through countries with poor eHGV charging infrastructure.

All of this makes it route optimisation vital for fleet operators planning journeys for their eHGVs. It should be noted that battery technology is constantly evolving, and capacity — and therefore mileage — will continue to improve in the near future.

High eHGV costs

The initial cost of an eHGV is high (typically between £160,000-£200,000, compared to between £80,000-£100,000 for a diesel HGV) which can potentially deter independent drivers and smaller fleet operators from owing one. This is largely due to the expense of the battery technology involved. This means that it will be costly to purchase a new electric HGV outright as the technology inside is more expensive than that of a diesel HGV.

High initial eHGV purchasing costs also means that fleet operators in countries with cheaper electricity rates for eHGV charging such as Norway, Sweden, or Finland are more likely to convert since they will recoup their investment quicker than those in countries with expensive electricity, such as Ireland and Croatia.

Electricity prices can also fluctuate in relation to various events. For example, over the past five years, electricity prices have fluctuated in response to economies opening up after the COVID-19 pandemic and then Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 (the latter in particular had major effects on European energy supply). As a result, there was a spike in electricity prices of almost 30%, from 20.5 c€/kWh, to 26.5 c€/kWh for the average EU capital in the post-invasion period. With the EU average now, however, lower than it was in 2022, it appears that electric charging for HGVs is set to continue its ascendency.

Across Europe, the average cost of running an electric HGV over 100 km is €20.51 — significantly cheaper than the €51.10 it costs for a diesel HGV over the same distance.

As efficiency improves and battery technology becomes more widespread and less expensive to produce, eHGVs will also become more affordable to acquire.

Cheapness and accessibility of diesel fuel

Diesel fuel still plays a dominant role in the HGV industry. This is because diesel infrastructure has been well established in Europe for decades, especially in comparison to electric chargers for HGVs. Diesel's compatibility with fuel cards, and its relatively cheapness also keep it popular with truck fleet managers.

As with electricity, however, the value of diesel fluctuates across the continent. This is why it can appear more advantageous to stick with diesel HGVs in countries like Moldova, Georgia, and Malta, where diesel remains cheap. Conversely, for nations like Iceland and the Netherlands, where diesel is relatively expensive, there is greater incentive to switch to an electric HGV.

A country with low-cost fuel may also be more hesitant to invest heavily in eHGV infrastructure for fear of alienating traditional HGV fleets, who may choose alternative routes as a result.

The future of electric HGVs in Europe

Electric HGVs are the long-term future of road haulage. Not only are they cheaper to run over time, but with new infrastructure being invested in and built at a strong rate, they will also become much more financially and strategically viable.

Beyond the economic benefits, electric HGVs are also important for their contribution to environmental goals such as Net Zero. With traditional HGVs being large-scale polluters, the emissions saved by eHGVs will be felt in cleaner air across Europe.

The following trends look set to impact electric HGVs in the future:

  • Smart truck parks: Truck parks in the future will evolve to better accommodate eHGVs alongside other smart technological advancements. These truck parks may include up-to-date ultra-fast charging stations, diagnostic machines, battery swap stations, and automated cleaning services, among other features.
  • Increased EU regulations: Low Emission Zones (LEZs) already exist in a number of cities (e.g. Paris, Berlin, and Milan) with more European cities likely to follow suit with more stringent EU transport regulations. Fleet operators may opt for eHGVs to meet EU regulations or retrofit their HGVs with cleaner technologies, like smart tachographs.
  • AI implementation: AI technology has already had a profound sustainability impact across road haulage — with applications in route optimisation, predictive maintenance, and autonomous vehicle development. Electric vehicles will likely incorporate AI to help drive sustainability in the haulage industry over the coming decades.
  • Sustainability: The shift to eHGVs is part of a wider global push toward sustainable living. The effects of extreme weather, including heatwaves and floods across Europe, show no sign of slowing due to climate change. Moving to electric HGVs is one way the world is reducing its dependence on fossil fuels.
  • Fuel variety: During the transition to cleaner fuel sources, there will be a variety of HGV types on the road throughout the 2030s. Many will be older diesel models, some will be electric, and others will be powered by alternative fuels such as biofuel made from renewable biomass sources.

Manage eHGV costs smarter

Electric HGVs are the future, of that there is little doubt. The economic and environmental benefits will see more fleet operators and drivers switch to eHGVs in the coming years. How long this transitional period lasts will depend on how quickly Europe can develop its eHGV charging infrastructure.

There are currently large swathes of the continent where eHGVs lack viability and require extensive route optimisation due to their shorter range. Additionally, the upfront costs involved can deter independent drivers and smaller fleet operators.

The technology and infrastructure will continue to improve, and there are already services designed to make managing eHGV fleets and related costs as simple as possible. From route optimisation and fleet management to maps for parking and truck washes, SNAP makes trucking simple.

Sign up to SNAP today.

Share to

Others also read...

Header Image

Tuesday 03 February 2026 • Industry News

THE RISE OF INTEGRATED LOGISTIC CORRIDORS: WHY THEY MATTER TO HAULIERS

Guest

For decades, European haulage has been built around road networks. Although rail, inland waterways and ports have always played a role, most freight journeys relied on HGVs to bridge the gaps. That model is now being reshaped.Across the EU, governments and infrastructure bodies are investing in integrated logistics corridors – long-distance, multimodal routes designed to move goods more efficiently across borders while reducing congestion, emissions and pressure on roads. For hauliers, these corridors are not an abstract policy concept. They are already influencing where trucks can travel, how journeys are planned and the technologies that fleets must adopt.Understanding how these corridors work – and what they mean in practice – is becoming essential for operators covering international routes.In Europe, integrated logistics corridors sit alongside the EU’s Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T). This long-term programme is designed to connect member states through coordinated road, rail, port and inland waterway infrastructure.At the core of this system are : Baltic-Adriatic North Sea-Baltic Mediterranean Orient-East Med Scandinavian-Mediterranean Rhine-Alpine Atlantic North Sea-Mediterranean Rhine-DanubeRather than treating road, rail and ports as separate systems, these corridors aim to integrate them. As such, there are aligned infrastructure standards, digital systems and operational rules, allowing freight to move more smoothly from origin to destination.In short, they prioritise multimodal freight. That might mean containers transferred seamlessly between ship, rail and truck, or trailers loaded onto trains for part of a journey before returning to the road network.One example is the use of , where entire HGVs are transported on low-floor rail wagons. Drivers often travel with their vehicles, resuming road journeys at the other end. Although they are typically associated with Alpine regions, Spain is investing heavily in to improve transport links. To make this coordination possible, logistics corridors rely heavily on digital infrastructure, including: Multimodal traffic management systems that coordinate rail slots, terminal capacity and road access. Digital freight documents to reduce paperwork at borders and terminals. and GNSS positioning to support compliance and monitoring. Real-time data sharing between infrastructure operators, logistics hubs and enforcement bodies.The goal is not to remove road haulage from the equation, but to make it part of a wider, more controlled system.Key European road routes are subject to high volumes of traffic, resulting in congestion and bottlenecks. Integrated corridors aim to relieve pressure by shifting some freight to rail or waterways where possible.In addition, recent data suggests that road transport accounts for . Integrated corridors support EU climate targets by encouraging use of other forms of transport, which will improve traffic flow and reduce stop-start congestion.For operators, the benefits of integrated logistics corridors are tangible, if not immediate. One of the most significant advantages is more predictable cross-border movement. Over time, this reduces uncertainty around journey times and improves scheduling for international routes.Corridors also expand options when road-only transport becomes constrained. Rolling highways and intermodal terminals can provide practical alternatives during periods of congestion, severe weather or regulatory restriction. At the same time, integrated digital systems improve visibility across journeys, giving fleet managers better data to plan rest breaks, terminal access and driving hours with greater accuracy and confidence.There are commercial implications too. By shifting long-haul legs to rail and reserving road transport for firstand last-mile delivery, some operators may limit their exposure to low-emission zones and urban access restrictions. In addition, trucks tied up on long-distance international routes are freed up for shorter, higher-frequency routes linked to logistics hubs and terminals. In parallel, removing the most expensive kilometres from a journey – those affected by , congestion or restrictions – can reduce operating costs. For hauliers that adapt their operating model, profitability becomes less about distance travelled and more about efficiency, reliability and the ability to deliver consistent service within tighter, more controlled time windows.Despite the advantages, integrated logistics corridors also introduce new complexity for hauliers. In several parts of Europe, restrictions on HGV movements are already in force, including night bans and quota-based access. As corridor strategies expand and environmental pressures increase, these measures could become more widespread and tightly enforced, adding constraints to route planning and scheduling.Progress across corridors is also uneven. While some routes benefit from modern terminals and upgraded rail links, others, such as the Rhine-Alpine corridor suffer from limited rail capacity, congested hubs and infrastructure gaps. In these areas, the promised efficiency gains can be undermined by delays and bottlenecks rather than resolved by them. This challenge is compounded by the complications of multimodal transport. Rail and terminal slots often involve advance booking and fixed timetables, reducing the flexibility that road-only operations have traditionally relied on to absorb disruption.Digital integration brings its own demands. Although shared data systems, smart tachographs and electronic documentation offer long-term efficiency, upfront investment in compatible fleet management tools is needed, alongside driver training and process change. For some operators this transition can be resource-intensive.Perhaps the most significant challenge, however, lies in competition. Integrated corridors tend to favour operators that can move freight predictably, digitally and across modes. Smaller or road-only operators may find themselves under pressure from larger fleets, intermodal specialists or logistics integrators offering bundled, end-to-end corridor solutions.For international hauliers, integrated corridors affect planning. Route choice is no longer just about distance and tolls. It involves:Assessing where road access may be limited. Identifying intermodal alternatives. Managing driver welfare across longer, more complex journeys. Ensuring compliance across multiple systems and jurisdictions.Fleets that understand how these corridors function and plan accordingly will be best placed to adapt as rules tighten and expectations rise.Integrated logistics corridors are reshaping how transport moves across Europe. They bring opportunities for greater efficiency and resilience, but also introduce new layers of operational and regulatory complexity for hauliers. As road transport becomes more tightly integrated with rail, ports and digital systems, driver welfare, planning certainty and access to reliable infrastructure matter more than ever. Fleet managers need clear visibility and control over costs, alongside confidence that drivers can stop and rest safely.Through our network of safe, reliable truck stops, paired with integrated payment solutions, we make life on the road simpler for both drivers and operators.

Header Image

Tuesday 16 December 2025 • Industry News

WHAT SPAIN’S MANDATORY DIGITAL RECORDS MEAN FOR FLEETS OPERATING IN EUROPE

Guest

Spain is preparing for one of the most significant transport reforms in its recent history. The Sustainable Mobility Law (Ley de Movilidad Sostenible), which received final approval in November 2025, will introduce mandatory digital records for road freight control documentation, creating a more transparent, enforceable and efficient system for domestic and international carriers. Although this is a major national change, it forms part of a wider trend. Across Europe, governments and operators are moving towards a fully digital freight environment as the EU prepares to implement the (eFTI).For fleets working in and out of Spain, this is the start of an important transition. It signals a future in which paper documentation becomes the exception rather than the rule and in which digital processes support faster checks, smoother operations and greater consistency across borders.While the Sustainable Mobility Law addresses wide-ranging transport reforms – from urban mobility to domestic flight restrictions – the provisions most relevant to international freight operators centre on digital documentation. A central section of the law introduces a mandatory digital “control document” for road freight. This includes the use of approved digital formats, such as the electronic consignment note (eCMR), which Spain has already ratified and treats as legally equivalent to the paper CMR note. The law aims to reduce administrative burdens, eliminate inconsistencies in paperwork and shorten the time required for checks and inspections. Rather than relying on handwritten notes or physical documents that can be misplaced, carriers will store, share and verify transport information digitally. For operators, this should mean fewer disputes over documentation, less ambiguity around compliance requirements and greater certainty when preparing for audits or regulatory reviews.In practice, the obligation focuses first on the digital control document used for roadside and regulatory checks, but it is expected to accelerate wider use of eCMR and other digital freight documents across the supply chain.The timeline for implementation will begin once the law is published in Spain's Official State Gazette. Carriers should expect the digital control document obligation to take effect roughly ten months after publication, making 2026 the likely year when full compliance will be required.The Mobility Law applies to road transport operations that fall under Spanish control rules on Spanish territory, not just Spanish-registered companies. Carriers will need to ensure their systems can produce and transmit digital records in compliant formats. Any delay in adopting digital documentation could slow down inspections or disrupt customer schedules.This means that foreign operators running international loads into, out of or through Spain should plan on being able to provide the required control document in digital form when requested by Spanish authorities.The Spanish reforms align closely with the EU’s eFTI Regulation, which will require Member States to accept digital freight documentation once the technical and certification rules are in place (from mid-2027). eFTI sets a unified framework for how information is structured, transmitted and verified. While it obliges authorities to accept digital records, it does not require operators to use them. Spain’s Mobility Law therefore goes further, making digital control documents mandatory for road freight.Under eFTI, carriers will be able to provide freight information electronically through certified platforms. Enforcement authorities will receive that information through secure digital channels. This should reduce administrative friction across the EU’s busiest freight routes.Spain is not alone in taking early steps. Several EU countries have already moved towards paperless freight systems and their experience demonstrates what a fully digital environment could look like.● The Netherlands has been one of the earliest adopters of eCMR and has trialled end-to-end digital workflows across different modes of transport. ● France also moved early, supporting digital documentation and faster roadside checks following its ratification of the eCMR protocol. ● In the Benelux region, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands are running a joint eCMR pilot and digital logistics corridor, illustrating how interoperable documentation can work across national boundaries.● Denmark and Sweden have operated national e-freight trials designed to simplify the sharing of transport information. Taken together, these examples show that Spain’s Mobility Law is part of a broader European transition. Rather than standing apart, Spain is moving in step with a continental shift towards digital documentation that aims to make road freight faster, more transparent and more consistent across borders.The move to digital records brings several practical advantages. Digital documents reduce the time drivers and enforcement officers spend handling paperwork and shorten inspections during roadside checks. This mirrors the benefits seen with the introduction of , which have reduced unnecessary stops for compliant drivers and improved the consistency of enforcement across Europe.Digital documentation also removes the errors that can arise from handwritten notes or damaged paper notes. Fleet managers can instantly retrieve records, resolve errors more easily and maintain clearer oversight of documentation across multiple routes. For operators managing complex schedules, this increased predictability supports better planning and stronger customer service.Drivers are likely to benefit too. A shift to digital records reduces administrative pressure and helps avoid disagreement at delivery points. With all documents stored digitally, drivers have a single source of truth that is accepted across the supply chain.Fleets may need to invest in updated transport management systems or integrate new tools that support digital documentation. Operators may require additional support and training to shift from paper-based processes to new digital workflows.There will also be a period of adjustment in which paper and digital systems may operate side by side. As eFTI becomes established across Europe, some countries will move faster than others. Operators travelling across different borders may encounter varying expectations, particularly in the early years.Throughout this transition, driver welfare should remain a priority. The administrative load associated with new processes often falls on drivers. Clear training and straightforward systems will be essential.Spain’s Mobility Law marks an important moment in the evolution of European freight. It reflects a sector that is modernising at speed and preparing for a future built on digital workflows rather than manual paperwork. Operators that begin preparing now will be in a strong position as Spain’s digital control document requirements take effect and eFTI comes into force across Europe.At SNAP, we support fleets across Spain and the wider continent with tools that make daily operations simpler and more predictable. The intruck app helps drivers locate and book secure parking along their route, which is particularly valuable as compliance processes evolve. If your fleet is preparing for Spain’s new requirements or the broader digital transition across Europe, SNAP is here to support every step of the journey.

Header Image

Wednesday 10 December 2025 • Industry News

THE 2025 UK BUDGET: WHAT IT MEANS FOR HAULAGE

Guest

The arrives at a difficult moment for the road transport sector. Operators are working against rising wages and operating costs, tight margins, ageing infrastructure and ongoing pressures around recruitment. At the same time, the shift towards cleaner mobility is accelerating, creating new expectations and increasing the need for long-term investment.The following article outlines what the Budget means for infrastructure, investment, workforce costs and the wider operating environment for haulage.For many years, fleets have been affected by deteriorating roads, weight restrictions on ageing bridges and the growing unpredictability of journey times. Government and industry data makes this clear. More than one in every ten miles of network in England and Wales is likely to require maintenance within the next year, according to reporting, and the backlogs for resurfacing work continue to rise. These issues lead to vehicle damage, driver fatigue, higher insurance costs and disrupted schedules. They also place additional pressure on operators already dealing with narrow margins.The new Budget acknowledges these concerns. One positive step is the substantial funding for strategic national projects, including almost £900 million allocated to the , which should reduce congestion, provide more reliable journey times and a safer driving environment for HGVs.Local authorities will also receive a share of and address the growing number of potholes. This could make a noticeable difference for fleets. Local roads carry the majority of domestic freight and serve as the first and last mile of nearly every delivery. Improving them should reduce wear and tear on vehicles as well as operational strain. These commitments will not fix decades of underinvestment immediately, but they represent an important shift towards a road network that is more resilient and better suited to the realities of modern logistics.The Budget also places more focus on skills. for under-25s working in small and medium-sized businesses could help attract new entrants into a profession that urgently needs them. The driver shortage is well documented. The UK must recruit around in order to stabilise supply chains, and across Europe the average age of professional drivers continues to climb. Only a small proportion of drivers are under 25, and training costs have been a barrier for many younger candidates.Providing funded apprenticeships makes logistics more accessible at a critical time. It also supports smaller operators, who often struggle to invest in training despite needing to expand their teams. The Budget introduces further support for investment, particularly around fleet renewal. Operators installing charging infrastructure can take advantage of a 100% first-year allowance until March 2027. This will help offset the upfront cost of electric HGVs and depot charging equipment.From January 2026, a new 40% first-year allowance will be available on many main-rate assets, including trucks – particularly useful where full expensing or the Annual Investment Allowance don’t apply, such as some leased fleets and unincorporated operators.While the Autumn Budget contains several positive measures, operators will also need to plan for increasing costs. Fuel duty will rise in stages between the end of August 2026 and March 2027. Fuel is already one of the largest expenses for operators, and the planned rises are likely to increase the emphasis on fuel efficiency, telematics, consolidated routing and fleet renewal.Vehicle Excise Duty (Road Tax) will be uprated in line with inflation from April 2026, including for HGVs. From April 2028, a new Electric Vehicle Excise Duty (eVED) will also apply a mileage-based charge to battery-electric and plug-in hybrid cars, on top of existing VED. Although eVED initially excludes electric vans and trucks, it signals a longer-term shift toward distance-based taxation that fleets will need to factor into future planning.The HGV Levy will also return to rising with inflation. Vehicles over twelve tonnes must pay the levy before using A roads or motorways, and the revised rate will add another cost that fleets must factor into forward planning.Larger, higher‑value properties are also likely to feel more pressure from business rates changes. The Budget confirms permanently lower business rates for retail, hospitality and leisure, funded in part by higher charges on the most expensive commercial premises. These include big warehouses and distribution centres, so operators with large sites can expect proportionately higher bills over time than smaller depots or high‑street locations.In addition, the Budget introduces several measures that directly affect the financial landscape for operators and the people who run or work within haulage businesses. Labour already represents one of the sector’s highest costs, and these changes will shape payroll planning, staff retention and the personal finances of many owner-operators.Minimum wage increases mean that employers will face higher staffing costs across warehousing, last-mile logistics and support roles. Many operators have already tackled wage rises in recent years, and this further uplift will add pressure at a time when margins remain narrow. For fleets that rely on overtime, night work or seasonal peaks, the impact will be even more noticeable.The Budget continues the government’s move toward greater digitalisation of tax and reporting. Compliance expectations will grow over the coming years, with stricter penalties for late VAT and Self Assessment returns and an expanded Making Tax Digital framework from 2027. Mandatory electronic invoicing will follow in 2029. Parcel carriers and mixed load operators will also be affected by changes to customs duty for low-value imports, which will apply to items worth less than £135 by March 2029 at the latest. While the aim is to even the playing field for UK manufacturers, it is likely to increase administrative pressure on haulage firms. These changes may eventually improve efficiency, but they will require investment in systems and staff training. Smaller fleets without dedicated administrative teams are likely to feel the adjustment most sharply.Although operators will face higher costs and increased administrative complexity, the 2025 Budget also provides some of the most significant commitments to the road network and skills pipeline seen in recent years. Taken together, these measures signal a Budget that attempts to balance fiscal constraints with long-term needs. The road ahead will still require careful planning and strategic investment, but there are genuine opportunities to strengthen the sector’s foundations and support a more resilient future for haulage.SNAP gives fleets practical tools to manage this shifting landscape, from parking access to data that supports compliance and operational decision-making. to discover how SNAP can help strengthen your fleet’s resilience in the months ahead.